There's no getting around it, I'm out of shape, or at least in no shape to run a full marathon. Although I had every intention of keeping up the pace after the LA Marathon, you can tell by the gap in time between this post and my last (real) post that I haven't been able to run much; my last lengthy run was a pathetic, wheezing 10 miler in late July. I went on a preparatory 5.77 miler trail run through Powder Canyon yesterday and was alarmed at how the entire world would spin every time I climbed a hill and I'd look like this guy:
They'd promised that LA was essentially a downhill run, and they lied - that mutha was hilly, only in that slow, painful way that never seemed to stop. They promised that Long Beach, being at sea level, was essentially flat, and that since the half is almost entirely at the beach, it had even fewer elevation changes - we'd see. But with the hope that the promise of levelness would outweigh my dietary indiscretions (note photo above), I signed up for the Long Beach Half, bib number 13,991, which, coincidentally, also was my expected finishing rank.
I went with my running buddy, Nicole - well, "running buddy" in the sense that we talked about it a lot and since she's a mother of three and also a full-time nursing student whose husband would like to see her on occasion as well, and I had... a lot of not-running going on, we never actually got to run together. My saintly wife drove us to downtown Long Beach (I often tell my wife that she's lucky because I don't enjoy watching team sports and therefore don't spend any time doing so, which in any other marriage might win me a gajillion points, only it's offset by the fact that she woke up at 5:30 am to drive me down to a footrace and then not only waited around for two and a half hours but also went to two different locations to cheer me on) (boy, when I put it like that...) where we alighted from the car like junior high schoolers at the mall and followed the crowds to the starting line.
A quick way to understand what a "thronging crowd" looks like is to wait around for the start of one of these big races. It's different from a mob, I've seen one or two of those and they're scary as hell, and it's not that a thronging crowd is exactly unintimidating, but to hear the buzz and activity, smelling the sweat and random farting, you finally understand how a crowd can throng (perhaps I could write a "throng song" to explain).
Everyone's largely good natured, particularly at the back of the pack. The runners are supposed to sort themselves into waves according to the time in which they think they're going to finish, and I suppose the positive view of things is that it's encouraging to see so many optimists together in one place. If the meaning of that sentence was unclear, I mean to say that a lot of slooooow people pack themselves in at the front of the line, slowing down the people who are at times considerably faster. Which I realized when I kept leaping from side to side and swerving through the crowd in order to pass all of the runners in front of me who were, improbably, even slower than I.
As a matter of fact, I kept passing people the entire way, which was really unusual. I was happiest about my form, which seems to have lasted through the past 7 months of indolence, and perhaps even improved in efficiency, a quick, easy cadence, bouncing off the midfoot, arms up at my side, little wasted movement, actually, if I were less efficient I might be able to burn off more calories, but whatever.
Thirteen point one is, don't get me wrong, a long distance, but it's a lot less, about half I'd say, of 26.2, and I didn't weigh myself down carrying a bunch of gels and didn't worry about the need to aggressively hydrate, I just kept moving forward, one foot on the ground. As opposed to one's self on the ground - I saw at least five people take tumbles on the road, young, otherwise healthy looking people, it was really odd, and I'm not sure if the accidents were attributable to klutziness, poor road conditions, just plain bad luck, or perhaps a combination of all of the above, but I've never seen so many people fall. It was nice seeing so many of their fellow runners spring to the aid of these fallen runners, so quickly that I didn't even have the chance to lope over and begin the entire awkward, "okay, so, well, I guess I'm a doctor and it looks like you just took a spill"-thing, plus the whole I'll-bill-your-insurance thing gets everyone so worked up.
There's always a point in a long run where I'll ask myself, why exactly am I doing this thing? Sometimes it's when I'm pressing the "send" button when I'm registering for a race online, today it was at about mile 11, and sometimes it's both. And the reason, of course, and as with most of the things that I do, it's so I can eat another slices of pizzas, or drink another beers or four (I burnt 1,616 calories during the run - yes, I will have another basket of fries, thank you). And then there's the entire sense of accomplishment, feeling of well-being, euphoric flood of joy around mile 8, etc. etc. But the pizza, that's what makes it all worth while.
Ill-trained, but I still did okay, at least earlier on when I was dodging and weaving around slower runners (all of that extra lateral motion added 0.2 miles to my run - my GPS recorded a 13.3 miler), but I felt the cumulative inactivity of the past 7 months start to drag on my calves towards the end. The very last stretch, the last 0.2, was a blessed downhill, a smile breaking on my sweaty face, and then the run was over. I suppose, over the coming months, that I could put down the cheeseburger and try to find the time to put in some more training, and I do believe I'll try, especially so I can work on keeping my pace even. But like the blog says, I'm Positively Split...
Long Beach Half Marathon
13.3 miles. 1hr:53min:30sec. 8:32 pace.
1,616 calories.
Sunday, October 9, 2011
Friday, August 12, 2011
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Get on the Midfoot!
As a nerdy, uncompetitive child, I didn't understand the allure of sunshine and sweat, but I think I'm getting it now...
Morning Pre-Work Run - Doing the Tighten Up w/VFF Bikilas
3.56 mi. 28 min.:01 sec. 7:52 pace.
Morning Pre-Work Run - Doing the Tighten Up w/VFF Bikilas
3.56 mi. 28 min.:01 sec. 7:52 pace.
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Seldom Fidelis
I guess everyone saw this one coming; that is, everyone except lil' ol' idealistic, romanticizing me.
It'll be different this time, better, and I swear that I won't get hurt this time. Until I did. Oh, Saucony Peregrines, I thought you were the answer but you only raised more questions when I began to feel pain in my left iliotibial band, questions like, "I wonder what shoe I'm going to have to try now?"
Here's the answer:
It'll be different this time, better, and I swear that I won't get hurt this time. Until I did. Oh, Saucony Peregrines, I thought you were the answer but you only raised more questions when I began to feel pain in my left iliotibial band, questions like, "I wonder what shoe I'm going to have to try now?"
Here's the answer:
A new pair of Vibram FiveFinger Bikilas. If they look vaguely familiar, it's because I'd actually had a green-and-white pair last year. They were my first pair of minimalist running shoes, my inauguration into midfoot striding, and I was delirious about them for the few weeks that I had them, aching soleus muscles and all, until I noticed that the outsole seemed to be peeling away from the upper. I took them back to the store and asked, "is this normal?" To which the reply was, "nope," and I received a full refund. "Okay; can I get another pair?" It was then that I learned that Vibram was entirely out of stock and it'd be another eight months before a new shipment came in. Eight months!? Glum city! Shoulders slumped, I left the store, and developed a beautiful long termer with Nike's Free Run+ (more to come on the Nike Free Run line), which are what I wore to run the drizzly 2011 L.A. Marathon.
But as you've noticed over the past few posts, it's been time to find a new pair of shoes, and here're the latest belles of the ball:
All 10 piggies! The Bikilas are named after Abebe Bikila, an Ethiopian marathoner who ran unshod to gold in the 1960 Rome summer Olympics. (I'd tried the Vibram TrekSports briefly last fall but discovered that they gave me wicked blisters, which meant they went straight back to REI.)
Frankly, after my dalliance with VFFs last year, I hadn't given serious thought to getting another pair, thinking things like, hey, maybe they were just a gimmick, and besides, my wife is glad that I'm not wearing toe-shoes, but then Vibrams made a cameo in Parks and Recreation as part of Chris Trager's collection, and then after the capture of Osama bin Laden, these pictures came out on the birthdayshoes.com website about Special Forces footwear:
wherein some astute, perhaps footwear-obsessed observer, noted what the SeAL was tiptoeing through the tulips in:
Okay, so maybe you'll be tempted to joke that seeing these toe-shoes made Osama die of laughter, but I somehow think the double-tap bullets to the chest and head were the actual cause of death. |
I didn't get the camouflage KSOs shown here, but rather got the Bikilas as Vibram's most running-specific FiveFingers shoes. The soles on the Bikilas are a whole 2mm thicker, i.e. more padded, than the KSOs, and they have a slightly grippier treading:
I picked them up today at REI (20% anniversary sale!), and even though I should be getting ready to go to Milwaukee tomorrow, couldn't resist taking them for a spin.
I've written before about running in zero-drop shoes, and the Bikilas were familiar territory. You get the same tap-tap-tap sound from the foot pods, although now that I've had a chance to sample several different kinds of minimalist shoes I have a better sense of what people mean when they say that one style has more cushioning versus another pair, etc. It's nice to run in zero-drop shoes again, although I can tell where my knees have been weakened a little by running in more padded, built-up trainers, but at least there's no IT band pain. Unlike the first pair of Bikilas I had last year, which had a totally hot-spot free liner, I noticed a little burning on the lateral midsole of my left foot. But running down the street in these foot-gloves felt good, my running form tightened up naturally, and even though they may look a little ridiculous, perhaps in the right setting they could look intimidating to, say, a terrorist.
Probably not if I'm wearing them; they'd probably just laugh at my farmer's tan.
First Run in New Vibram FiveFingers Bikilas
3.55 mi. 28 min.:31 sec. 8:01 pace.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Here We Go Again
My wife asks me to take a marriage compatibility inventory/test that’s in the book she’s reading – why do women find these things so interesting?
We get to the question, “can you name three things that are causes of stress for your spouse?” The first words out of her mouth are, “finding a new running shoe.” Oh – so that’s why women find these things so interesting.
I really wanted to like the New Balance MT101s, I really did. I’d read such glowing reviews about them in all of the trail/ultra/running blogs I frequent, as well as for another, more hidden reason: when I was in high school I had not-so-secret dreams of becoming a rock and roll god, a guitar hero, tight leather pants and big hair optional, but wailing feedback and distorted hammer-taps on the fretboard, multiple issues of “Guitar World” bought with my allowance when other, cooler kids were spending that cash on beer and drugs. A big part of this aspirational streak was the impulse to buy the same gear that my six-string saints slung – limited, of course, by budget – but the same brand, at any rate. I remember browsing the racks of one Guitar Center, dwelling on the Ibanez guitars, the brand that my then-current hero, Joe Satriani, played, when my mentor, who was helping me shop for a new guitar, pulled me aside, out of earshot of the salesman, whispering with no little frustration at my fixation, “hey, dude, why the hard-on for the Ibanez’s?”
Okay. So I wouldn’t call my desire to like the MT101s exactly a hard-on, and I wouldn’t call Tony Krupicka and the Skaggs my pantheon of running idols, but still, I really wanted to like the running shoe they’d had so much input into designing. And as you can guess, I didn’t.
So much seemed to make sense, the shoe’s light weight, lugged outsole, minimalist upper, but these attributes added up, at least for me, a shoe that was good from far, far from good. Perhaps it’s my own weird foot anatomy or something, but this shoe not only gave me some Achilles pain, also made the head of my fifth metatarsal ache, and after the second brief run with these problems I decided enough was enough and returned them to the store from which I’d adopted them.
I then did what a lot of people do when they’re looking for love: I turned to the internet. No, there is no eHarmony for shoes, no match.com for sneakers, but rather, I turned to Skynet with the hope that the wisdom of the running masses could crowdsource me some ideas for a trail-running shoe.
Which brought me to the Saucony Peregrine:
The Runner’s World Editor’s Choice award recipient for trail shoes, it’s a trail-running version of their wildly popular Kinvara, which is even more minimalizzle (meaning less actual minimalist) than the NB MT101, but has sold extremely well as a transition-to-minimalism shoe.
I’d shied away from the Kinvaras, because they just seemed like a lot more shoe than I had wanted as an aspiring minimalist, which you can see on this profile of the Peregrines:
Although they’re still light, particularly compared to most trail shoes, they feel oddly substantial, particularly if your benchmark is a minimalist shoe (not to mention your bare feet).
These things are definitely “Shoes”, capital S, and the Satriani-worshipping part of me that wanted to run like a Tarahumaru revolted against these things.
The toe box is, relative to many minimal shoes, fairly constrictive and more like a standard running shoe. The outsole lugs are pretty impressive:
We get to the question, “can you name three things that are causes of stress for your spouse?” The first words out of her mouth are, “finding a new running shoe.” Oh – so that’s why women find these things so interesting.
I really wanted to like the New Balance MT101s, I really did. I’d read such glowing reviews about them in all of the trail/ultra/running blogs I frequent, as well as for another, more hidden reason: when I was in high school I had not-so-secret dreams of becoming a rock and roll god, a guitar hero, tight leather pants and big hair optional, but wailing feedback and distorted hammer-taps on the fretboard, multiple issues of “Guitar World” bought with my allowance when other, cooler kids were spending that cash on beer and drugs. A big part of this aspirational streak was the impulse to buy the same gear that my six-string saints slung – limited, of course, by budget – but the same brand, at any rate. I remember browsing the racks of one Guitar Center, dwelling on the Ibanez guitars, the brand that my then-current hero, Joe Satriani, played, when my mentor, who was helping me shop for a new guitar, pulled me aside, out of earshot of the salesman, whispering with no little frustration at my fixation, “hey, dude, why the hard-on for the Ibanez’s?”
Okay. So I wouldn’t call my desire to like the MT101s exactly a hard-on, and I wouldn’t call Tony Krupicka and the Skaggs my pantheon of running idols, but still, I really wanted to like the running shoe they’d had so much input into designing. And as you can guess, I didn’t.
So much seemed to make sense, the shoe’s light weight, lugged outsole, minimalist upper, but these attributes added up, at least for me, a shoe that was good from far, far from good. Perhaps it’s my own weird foot anatomy or something, but this shoe not only gave me some Achilles pain, also made the head of my fifth metatarsal ache, and after the second brief run with these problems I decided enough was enough and returned them to the store from which I’d adopted them.
I then did what a lot of people do when they’re looking for love: I turned to the internet. No, there is no eHarmony for shoes, no match.com for sneakers, but rather, I turned to Skynet with the hope that the wisdom of the running masses could crowdsource me some ideas for a trail-running shoe.
Which brought me to the Saucony Peregrine:
The Runner’s World Editor’s Choice award recipient for trail shoes, it’s a trail-running version of their wildly popular Kinvara, which is even more minimalizzle (meaning less actual minimalist) than the NB MT101, but has sold extremely well as a transition-to-minimalism shoe.
I’d shied away from the Kinvaras, because they just seemed like a lot more shoe than I had wanted as an aspiring minimalist, which you can see on this profile of the Peregrines:
Although they’re still light, particularly compared to most trail shoes, they feel oddly substantial, particularly if your benchmark is a minimalist shoe (not to mention your bare feet).
These things are definitely “Shoes”, capital S, and the Satriani-worshipping part of me that wanted to run like a Tarahumaru revolted against these things.
The toe box is, relative to many minimal shoes, fairly constrictive and more like a standard running shoe. The outsole lugs are pretty impressive:
On the one hand, wearing these (relative for minimalist) burly shoes, as compared to a minimalist zero-drop model, makes you feel like you’re walking on pillows six inches off the ground, which runs contrary to the minimalist/Satriani ideal. On the other hand, the heel-to-toe drop of the Peregrines is a much-more-minimalist-felicitous 4mm, compared to the near centimeter drop of the MT101s.
They ain’t pretty but they look like they’d git ‘er done. For some reason, perhaps the lower heel-toe drop, they make me fast; I can keep up with a mid-8 pace with surprising ease and lack of effort. Maybe it’s the placebo effect of those chunky lugs, but I could run in them with a surprising speed. One observation that’s been shared around on the interwebs is that the outsoles are surprisingly grippy, and I’d have to agree. Perhaps it’s little more than the placebo effect, but even doing nothing as exciting as walking across the parking lot to the gym, I noticed a surprising degree of traction with these shoes, even just on the concrete walking from the car to the gym.
“What do you think of these?” I ask my wife. “Oh, they look nice – they look like normal shoes.” I know what stresses my wife out right now: the thought that I might buy another pair of toe-shoes.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
An Update, Plus, The Continued Search For the One(s)
If you were raised as an evangelical Christian in the U.S. during the latter part of the last century, you were probably subjected to what became the near veneration of sex and marriage (stay with me on this one, it'll get to running eventually) (although some of you may be wishing that I'd stay on the subject of sex) that led kids of my age to absurdities like the book I Kissed Dating Goodbye and the constant, embarrassed, giggly, socially-ritarded practice of "courtship" over dating and looking for "the one".
Bullshit.
Okay - before you get me wrong, it's not that I don't totally believe in and practice monogamy (if you're reading this, love you, honey!), but rather that attitude of looking for a "the one" blinded a lot of us to the fact that there are a lot of cool people in the world who don't have to be a "the one" to get to know and still be friends with, without all of that fussy pressure of asking every new person you meet if you're going to have to spend the rest of your life with them.
Which is (finally) the roundabout way of me getting to say that today, I returned the Merrell Trail Gloves to REI (quick plug for REI - the outstanding return policy is reason enough to buy from them). Over the past couple of weeks I'd put about 42 miles on them, and during the course of these runs I'd discovered that at least for my feet, these shoes were totally wrong. I've had a number of really lovely runs in these shoes, including several around the south end of Manhattan with a nice view of Lady Liberty, but: there's the pain over the head of my fifth metatarsal that I'd mentioned a post ago, which improved with loosening the shoes, but persisted. The final straw was a run I took today: the pain I'd been having over my Achilles tendon worsened to the point that I kept stopping every half mile to adjust the shoes, and then considered taking them off entirely, but deciding for certain that they were going back to the store.
Which is a shame, because in many other ways they're terrific; the upper is rugged but breathable, the outsole is grippy Vibram, and I can't say enough about how much I enjoy, and how much faster I am, running in true zero-drop shoes. But over the past week or so I found myself guiltily reaching for other shoes before today's decision to drop the Merrell's for good. I thug them, love them, leave them because I don't really need them - I have become the Jay-Z of running shoes.
And like any philanderer I found that I couldn't be without a sole-mate for long and spent part of the day glumly and somewhat frantically looking for alternates. I thought about another pair of FiveFingers, which had the advantage of being zero-drop, but worried that they'd be too delicate for trail running. I went to the local running shop in search of the New Balance Minimus Trail, which I'd eschewed as not minimal enough but found myself minimizing the flaws I'd thought of instead, like the ex-lover you pine for and try to explain away all of the negative traits that'd bugged you into leaving, only to discover that like said ex-lover these shoes had all found other homes (the store was sold out). I thought about other popular trail shoes, but found them too expensive, too bulky, maximalist rather than minimalist.
When I found these:
Bullshit.
Okay - before you get me wrong, it's not that I don't totally believe in and practice monogamy (if you're reading this, love you, honey!), but rather that attitude of looking for a "the one" blinded a lot of us to the fact that there are a lot of cool people in the world who don't have to be a "the one" to get to know and still be friends with, without all of that fussy pressure of asking every new person you meet if you're going to have to spend the rest of your life with them.
Which is (finally) the roundabout way of me getting to say that today, I returned the Merrell Trail Gloves to REI (quick plug for REI - the outstanding return policy is reason enough to buy from them). Over the past couple of weeks I'd put about 42 miles on them, and during the course of these runs I'd discovered that at least for my feet, these shoes were totally wrong. I've had a number of really lovely runs in these shoes, including several around the south end of Manhattan with a nice view of Lady Liberty, but: there's the pain over the head of my fifth metatarsal that I'd mentioned a post ago, which improved with loosening the shoes, but persisted. The final straw was a run I took today: the pain I'd been having over my Achilles tendon worsened to the point that I kept stopping every half mile to adjust the shoes, and then considered taking them off entirely, but deciding for certain that they were going back to the store.
Which is a shame, because in many other ways they're terrific; the upper is rugged but breathable, the outsole is grippy Vibram, and I can't say enough about how much I enjoy, and how much faster I am, running in true zero-drop shoes. But over the past week or so I found myself guiltily reaching for other shoes before today's decision to drop the Merrell's for good. I thug them, love them, leave them because I don't really need them - I have become the Jay-Z of running shoes.
And like any philanderer I found that I couldn't be without a sole-mate for long and spent part of the day glumly and somewhat frantically looking for alternates. I thought about another pair of FiveFingers, which had the advantage of being zero-drop, but worried that they'd be too delicate for trail running. I went to the local running shop in search of the New Balance Minimus Trail, which I'd eschewed as not minimal enough but found myself minimizing the flaws I'd thought of instead, like the ex-lover you pine for and try to explain away all of the negative traits that'd bugged you into leaving, only to discover that like said ex-lover these shoes had all found other homes (the store was sold out). I thought about other popular trail shoes, but found them too expensive, too bulky, maximalist rather than minimalist.
When I found these:
The New Balance MT101. No cute name like "Minimi" or "Trail Kitten", just the manufacturer and a model number. Not bad looking, not weird looking, but not anything special either. But before the current explosion of minimalist/barefoot shoes had set the shoe-world a-twitterpated, these were the go-tos.
They have the distinction of having an association with this guy:
Nice kid, looks like Jesus, American ultra-running super-duper guy. Runs 100 milers. (Although he and a number of others are giving mad e-props to some Spanish kid named Kilian Jornet, who probably also has running shoes to sell, but which aren't of the minimal/barefoot variety and therefore of less interest to your humble correspondent.) But the MT101s were allegedly made with input from him and the brothers Skaggs, which works great as a marketing tool. As you can see. From my purchase.
This model is a couple of years old, though, and is being outshone by all of the new trail-running gear out there. And the thing is, it's not minimalist, really, but more minimalizzle. It has a whopping (at least it's whopping for me, although most non-min running shoes apparently have 18mm of drop) 10mm heel-toe drop, so it's not-flat, and more of a transition to zero-drop from a standard running shoe. But there's a nice, roomy toe-box:
And the aggressive, lugged outsole that I wanted to run trails, but wouldn't trap pebbles in the sipes:
There've been a number of very positive reviews of the shoe, but then again, there were a number of positive reviews of the Trail Glove; the reason I settled on the MT101s was because as an older shoe they had an established track record (no pun intended - that woulda been an established trail record), and as an older shoe, the price: $60! Awesome!
Final point of clarification: I by no means settled for my wife like I settled for my MT101s - she's my zero-drop rugged upper Vibram soled perfection!
What, you don't find running-shoe metaphors romantic?
Merrells Versus Achilles - Achilles Wins (because the Merrells went back to the store)
4.69 mi. 39 min:04 sec. 8:20 pace.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Across Country Running
I woke up in a strange city today (not cuz of drugs - I'm in town for the annual meeting of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Which, I suppose, is more like an equipment rather than a drug manufacturer). It used to be that I'd ask about the good places to eat or drink in town, but lately it's become a question of where I should go for a run.
Easily answered! Rather than looking at Yelp or Citysearch, I just fired up the computer and looked up the mapmyrun website. Quick address entry and a bunch of local routes showed up, sorted by mileage. Here's the curious low-tech/high-tech part: I wrote turn-by-turn directions on an index card, fired up the GPS watch (you can download routes onto the watch but the process is more cumbersome than it's worth), and went for a quick five-miler in an unfamiliar neighborhood - magic!
What we need now is a Yelp that reviews run routes... million dollar idea!
Merrell Trail Glove Update
I wrote that review after one six mile run; now, having logged a couple of more miles on them, a few more observations:
•It's possible to cinch the shoes on too tight in the midfoot, causing some pain on the toe extensors.
•My right foot is almost half a size smaller than my left foot, which usually results in a loose fit and blistering, particularly on my midsole where I've had successive generations of blisters and skin-sloughing. Out of this fear, I've been really cranking down on the laces, but I've discovered that tying the shies too tightly means the shoe's collar digs into the Achilles tendon, with the resultant pain, inflammation, and yes, blistering. What works, however, is to trust the shoes' fit and tying them with some moderation, rather than performing the equivalent of garroting your ankles.
Perfect Running Weather Through the Jersey 'Burbs (44F and Drizzly)
5.08 mi. 45 min.: 22.59 sec. 8:55 pace.
Easily answered! Rather than looking at Yelp or Citysearch, I just fired up the computer and looked up the mapmyrun website. Quick address entry and a bunch of local routes showed up, sorted by mileage. Here's the curious low-tech/high-tech part: I wrote turn-by-turn directions on an index card, fired up the GPS watch (you can download routes onto the watch but the process is more cumbersome than it's worth), and went for a quick five-miler in an unfamiliar neighborhood - magic!
What we need now is a Yelp that reviews run routes... million dollar idea!
Merrell Trail Glove Update
I wrote that review after one six mile run; now, having logged a couple of more miles on them, a few more observations:
•It's possible to cinch the shoes on too tight in the midfoot, causing some pain on the toe extensors.
•My right foot is almost half a size smaller than my left foot, which usually results in a loose fit and blistering, particularly on my midsole where I've had successive generations of blisters and skin-sloughing. Out of this fear, I've been really cranking down on the laces, but I've discovered that tying the shies too tightly means the shoe's collar digs into the Achilles tendon, with the resultant pain, inflammation, and yes, blistering. What works, however, is to trust the shoes' fit and tying them with some moderation, rather than performing the equivalent of garroting your ankles.
Perfect Running Weather Through the Jersey 'Burbs (44F and Drizzly)
5.08 mi. 45 min.: 22.59 sec. 8:55 pace.
Friday, April 8, 2011
Running Revyoo: Merrell Trail Glove
An epic always starts in media res, that is, "in the midst of things" (ah, the benefits of a liberal arts educatiom), meaning that the narrative begins smack dab in the middle of the action, which grabs the reader/listener/watcher from the git-go. The problem is exposition, explaining how the story got to where it is. Writers will often use some tiresome device to bring the audience up to speed, like the naive character who's new to the present action and gets a filling-in from the grizzled veteran ("awright, cherry, you're new to the unit, so you gotta learn that you never go sticking your nose in foxholes or you'll get all us grunts killed" etc. etc. etc.).
You may already be well familiar with running minimalism, in which case a summary would be laborious, or all of those people running in bare feet and weird toe-shoes may seem cultish, in which case you may simply not be interested, but anyway, in terms of the recent history of running, minimalist footwear, and the reason why I got this particular shoe, it's kind of a long story, so in the words of Inigo Montoya, let me sum up (you can think of this following bit as something like the narrated montage that they use at the beginning of a t.v. show's new season):
Here's the idea: human beings are natural born distance runners, and for most of history we ran barefoot, landing lightly on the balls of our feet with our legs working like springs. Landing on our heels with legs stretched straight was a development of Nike running shoes with over-cushioned soles in the 70's, and like most things from the 70's this idea was bad for our knees, backs, and photo albums. Enter the barefoot/minimalist running movement which preached that having less to no cushioning in one's shoes, particularly in the heel, was next to godliness (this guy even looks a bit like a prophet) (or Forrest Gump, if you wanted to be mean about it) (he seems like a nice kid) (pretty good runner, apparently), which resulted in those unease-causing Vibram Five Fingers and talk about the soles of shoes (or souls, if you want to continue the religious/cult theme) amount of height difference between (over-cushioned) heels and the toes, or the "heel-toe drop", the idea being that less of a drop means that the sole is flatter and therefore closer to the way a foot is supposed to work.
Whew! So, that bit of exposition safely behind us, without any talk of cherries or foxholes, we can move on to the present action, my try-out of the Merrell Trail Glove. Others have observed that "glove" is a misnomer, because unlike the Vibram Five Fingers shoes the Trail Glove doesn't have individually articulated toes pockets; many of these same observers have already made the joke that the Merrell's are therefore more like trail mittens, although that doesn't sound as sexy, one supposes (although "glove" doesn't sound all that sexy either) (unless you're into that sort of thing). But without any further ado, here's what they look like:
Not a bad looking shoe, huh? Get this: the color is "smoke and yellow"! (I had no idea what that meant or who Wiz Khalifa is, but recently I had a drunk/stoned guy at work sing that in my face. "What's he saying?" I asked, concerned that he might be hallucinating about Sting. The weary-looking paramedic holding him down turned to me and said, "that's just a hip-hop song, doc." Oh.) On the plus side, it looks like a shoe. I've had Vibrams before, including the Bikila and the TrekSport and actually really liked running in these zero-drop, "natural" running shoes, but the Bikilas had a manufacturing defect that required their return and the fit on the TrekSports gave my feet gnarly blisters, and since then my aesthetician has forbidden me from buying shoes that make people want to feed me bananas and in turn make me want to fling poo at them (although I wonder what my cosmologist would say?) (okay, so he's a political philosopher and not a cosmologist - or a cosmetologist - but gimme a break, I'm trying here, people!).
Since my dalliance with the Five Fingers shoes I've been running in Nike Free Run+ shoes, Nike's minimalist, or at least transition-to-minimal shoes, that have served me well - I've run about 850 miles in them, including the recent drizzly L.A. Marathon. But the Nike's aren't zero-drop shoes, and seeing photos of me from the marathon with sloppy form and a wicked heel-strike motivated me to look for a new pair of trainers. (Of course, my sloppy form may have had to do with the fact that it was raining at levels that inspired animals to pair off and start looking for arks to board, but it's gotta be the shoes, no?)
The Trail Gloves meet the high standards of low soles that minimalist running shoes are supposed to have, in that they are zero-drop, which was ultimately the reason I chose them over their nearest competitor, the New Balance Minimus Trail which have a 4mm drop. (I struggled a while trying to decide between the two, particularly since the Minimus was developed by Tony Krupicka, the bearded, long-haired ultrarunner I referenced earlier, but it's going to take a whole lot more than a pair of shoes to make me run a 100 miler.) (Although at times I think it'd be fun to grow my hair back out.) (Cue disapproving expression on the above-referenced aesthetician's face.) (Insert re-use of joke about cosmologist.) The outsoles are rugged-looking, tready Vibrams:
Unlike the Nike Free's, it doesn't look like pebbles are getting anywhere up in there. (Bam Bam's another story.) (Um, gross.) (But the point is that there's no protective rock-plate in the midsole, so if you tread on a rock bigger than a pebble, you'll notice.)
The uppers are really nice-looking mesh, with a roomy toe box for toe wigglin':
Which, of course, makes them look all the more like mittens. Maybe boxing gloves.
I laced them up; the laces really aggressively lock the uppers down onto your feet, particularly the midfoot, but with all of the toe-wigglin' referenced above still preserved. As others have noted, the shoes typically fit best about a half size down from what you may be accustomed to wearing. I was going to wear them to the gym to try them out in controlled, indoors conditions on a treadmill, but looking out the window I noticed it was a nice day and decided instead that I'd take it to the street. And then immediately regretting using the douchey phrase "taking it to the street."
Standing in zero-drop shoes was momentarily odd, because rather than feeling like the heel is lower, they feel instead like someone put a tennis ball under your midfoot (and for those who actually run trails on a regular basis rather than the concrete jungle I run through, repeat N.B., there is no rock-plate in the midfoot) (no tennis ball either, despite what I just said), and then they felt supremely familiar - they feel just like the Vibram Five Fingers shoes do. The insole is comfortably silky, just like the Vibrams.
Heading out in minimalist footwear is literal: you lean forward and let your feet kinda catch up with your fall. The Trail Gloves have a firm sole with little cushioning, so you hear a "tap-tap-tap" rather than a thud or a pad, that tap another familiar sensation from the Vibrams. Running in zero-drop shoes for the first time will really tax your calves - when I first ran in the Vibrams my calves, particularly the flat soleus muscles, killed for a week or two, the cramps in which my aesthetician kindly rolled out with a rolling pin (the joys of marriage - picture me whimpering on the couch while my long-suffering wife takes a wooden rolling pin to my solei - that's love, people). However, it appears that all of the early training and practice in zero-drop shoes is still paying off, because running with a midfoot strike in these new zero-drop shoes gave me no problems. Setting out in the Trail Gloves, I felt a momentary twinge in my left Achilles' tendon, which then disappeared, and the rest of my run was easy, smooth, and light, just the tap-tap-tap of my midfoot strike. That trail? Yeah, I'd tap that.
Like a lot of these minimalist shoes, they're meant to be worn without socks. Wanna know something? Running in shoes without socks totally exfoliates your feet! Gross, huh? I know.
Yes, I'm Smitten with the Merrell Trail Mitten!
5.38 mi. 46 min.:3 sec. 8:33 pace.
You may already be well familiar with running minimalism, in which case a summary would be laborious, or all of those people running in bare feet and weird toe-shoes may seem cultish, in which case you may simply not be interested, but anyway, in terms of the recent history of running, minimalist footwear, and the reason why I got this particular shoe, it's kind of a long story, so in the words of Inigo Montoya, let me sum up (you can think of this following bit as something like the narrated montage that they use at the beginning of a t.v. show's new season):
Here's the idea: human beings are natural born distance runners, and for most of history we ran barefoot, landing lightly on the balls of our feet with our legs working like springs. Landing on our heels with legs stretched straight was a development of Nike running shoes with over-cushioned soles in the 70's, and like most things from the 70's this idea was bad for our knees, backs, and photo albums. Enter the barefoot/minimalist running movement which preached that having less to no cushioning in one's shoes, particularly in the heel, was next to godliness (this guy even looks a bit like a prophet) (or Forrest Gump, if you wanted to be mean about it) (he seems like a nice kid) (pretty good runner, apparently), which resulted in those unease-causing Vibram Five Fingers and talk about the soles of shoes (or souls, if you want to continue the religious/cult theme) amount of height difference between (over-cushioned) heels and the toes, or the "heel-toe drop", the idea being that less of a drop means that the sole is flatter and therefore closer to the way a foot is supposed to work.
Whew! So, that bit of exposition safely behind us, without any talk of cherries or foxholes, we can move on to the present action, my try-out of the Merrell Trail Glove. Others have observed that "glove" is a misnomer, because unlike the Vibram Five Fingers shoes the Trail Glove doesn't have individually articulated toes pockets; many of these same observers have already made the joke that the Merrell's are therefore more like trail mittens, although that doesn't sound as sexy, one supposes (although "glove" doesn't sound all that sexy either) (unless you're into that sort of thing). But without any further ado, here's what they look like:
Not a bad looking shoe, huh? Get this: the color is "smoke and yellow"! (I had no idea what that meant or who Wiz Khalifa is, but recently I had a drunk/stoned guy at work sing that in my face. "What's he saying?" I asked, concerned that he might be hallucinating about Sting. The weary-looking paramedic holding him down turned to me and said, "that's just a hip-hop song, doc." Oh.) On the plus side, it looks like a shoe. I've had Vibrams before, including the Bikila and the TrekSport and actually really liked running in these zero-drop, "natural" running shoes, but the Bikilas had a manufacturing defect that required their return and the fit on the TrekSports gave my feet gnarly blisters, and since then my aesthetician has forbidden me from buying shoes that make people want to feed me bananas and in turn make me want to fling poo at them (although I wonder what my cosmologist would say?) (okay, so he's a political philosopher and not a cosmologist - or a cosmetologist - but gimme a break, I'm trying here, people!).
Since my dalliance with the Five Fingers shoes I've been running in Nike Free Run+ shoes, Nike's minimalist, or at least transition-to-minimal shoes, that have served me well - I've run about 850 miles in them, including the recent drizzly L.A. Marathon. But the Nike's aren't zero-drop shoes, and seeing photos of me from the marathon with sloppy form and a wicked heel-strike motivated me to look for a new pair of trainers. (Of course, my sloppy form may have had to do with the fact that it was raining at levels that inspired animals to pair off and start looking for arks to board, but it's gotta be the shoes, no?)
See? Good form=smile on my face. |
Bad form=wicked heel strike, no smile. |
The Trail Gloves meet the high standards of low soles that minimalist running shoes are supposed to have, in that they are zero-drop, which was ultimately the reason I chose them over their nearest competitor, the New Balance Minimus Trail which have a 4mm drop. (I struggled a while trying to decide between the two, particularly since the Minimus was developed by Tony Krupicka, the bearded, long-haired ultrarunner I referenced earlier, but it's going to take a whole lot more than a pair of shoes to make me run a 100 miler.) (Although at times I think it'd be fun to grow my hair back out.) (Cue disapproving expression on the above-referenced aesthetician's face.) (Insert re-use of joke about cosmologist.) The outsoles are rugged-looking, tready Vibrams:
Unlike the Nike Free's, it doesn't look like pebbles are getting anywhere up in there. (Bam Bam's another story.) (Um, gross.) (But the point is that there's no protective rock-plate in the midsole, so if you tread on a rock bigger than a pebble, you'll notice.)
The uppers are really nice-looking mesh, with a roomy toe box for toe wigglin':
Which, of course, makes them look all the more like mittens. Maybe boxing gloves.
I laced them up; the laces really aggressively lock the uppers down onto your feet, particularly the midfoot, but with all of the toe-wigglin' referenced above still preserved. As others have noted, the shoes typically fit best about a half size down from what you may be accustomed to wearing. I was going to wear them to the gym to try them out in controlled, indoors conditions on a treadmill, but looking out the window I noticed it was a nice day and decided instead that I'd take it to the street. And then immediately regretting using the douchey phrase "taking it to the street."
Standing in zero-drop shoes was momentarily odd, because rather than feeling like the heel is lower, they feel instead like someone put a tennis ball under your midfoot (and for those who actually run trails on a regular basis rather than the concrete jungle I run through, repeat N.B., there is no rock-plate in the midfoot) (no tennis ball either, despite what I just said), and then they felt supremely familiar - they feel just like the Vibram Five Fingers shoes do. The insole is comfortably silky, just like the Vibrams.
Heading out in minimalist footwear is literal: you lean forward and let your feet kinda catch up with your fall. The Trail Gloves have a firm sole with little cushioning, so you hear a "tap-tap-tap" rather than a thud or a pad, that tap another familiar sensation from the Vibrams. Running in zero-drop shoes for the first time will really tax your calves - when I first ran in the Vibrams my calves, particularly the flat soleus muscles, killed for a week or two, the cramps in which my aesthetician kindly rolled out with a rolling pin (the joys of marriage - picture me whimpering on the couch while my long-suffering wife takes a wooden rolling pin to my solei - that's love, people). However, it appears that all of the early training and practice in zero-drop shoes is still paying off, because running with a midfoot strike in these new zero-drop shoes gave me no problems. Setting out in the Trail Gloves, I felt a momentary twinge in my left Achilles' tendon, which then disappeared, and the rest of my run was easy, smooth, and light, just the tap-tap-tap of my midfoot strike. That trail? Yeah, I'd tap that.
Like a lot of these minimalist shoes, they're meant to be worn without socks. Wanna know something? Running in shoes without socks totally exfoliates your feet! Gross, huh? I know.
Yes, I'm Smitten with the Merrell Trail Mitten!
5.38 mi. 46 min.:3 sec. 8:33 pace.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
We Who Are About To Participate In An Endurance Sport Salute You
I wonder if I've always approached pain differently.
Believe it or don't, like Al Bundy, I played high school football during my freshman and sophomore years. Being the opposite of nimble, I was placed on the offensive and defensive lines, which was a shame because I was also the opposite of big and strong.
The event that I recall took place during my sophomore year, the year I realized that everyone else was still growing while I had stopped. I was (and am) all of 5'6" and 150 pounds, playing center on the defensive line (notice the problem here?) during a practice scrimmage. The ball snapped, my reflexes are pretty swift so I went forward into the grunting, thudding mass of the line, when I felt a body at my knees and another hitting me across the torso making me fall leftward with my arm outstretched. I felt my hand hit someone's smooth, plastic helmet followed by a sudden numbness. The play ended, I sat up, held my left hand in front of me, noticed something amiss, and said, "coach, I think I dislocated my finger"; my little finger was pointing off in a funny direction, and I didn't feel any pain, just a bit of surprise at this new angle that my finger had taken.
The coach sprinted over, maroon cap over his graying hair, dark sunglasses, gray cotton shirt tucked into his too-short maroon shorts in a way that accented his old man's belly and saggy groin (the problem with being a writer: you see too much), skinny old man's extremities all akimbo except for the arm under which he'd tucked his clipboard. He paused for a split second, apprising himself of the situation, then without further question or hesitation grasped my hand and popped the joint back in place. I'd been, if not exactly numb, since I'd known something was wrong, in something like discomfort, but then noted, also with surprise, "huh, it's starting to hurt now." My father took me to the local hospital where x-rays were taken, a splint applied, and ever since then I've had a little more curvature to that particular joint, an extra little bend, and this experience with pain.
Or going back even further into the past: I remember visiting the dentist as a child. Now, I never had the same apprehension on these visits as many of my friends had, which is perhaps the sign of a faulty long-term memory that would otherwise have associated "trip to the dentist" with "drill to the face", or perhaps I just had a different experience with pain.
The dentist's office was nothing particularly special, not geared towards children, no murals of firetrucks and giraffes. The dentist herself was a well-put-together Korean lady, not the kind who would fawn over children. I remember sitting in the chair, staring up into exam light, hearing the drill whine; every so often, if I let out a little whimper or if a tear would well up in one eye, the dentist would say, "tut-tut," and the gasp would stop or the tear would magically roll back. I would, every now and again, feel myself tense up as something was being scraped or drilled or dynamited, notice that I was tensing up, and then making myself relax and open my mouth wider, unlike my siblings, who had to have bite-blocks placed in order for the dentist to work. Years later, as an adult, I would go back to this same dentist since I hadn't known who else to go to, and thinking with mild surprise that she hadn't seemed to have aged. At all. And wondering if her command over my pain had involved some sort of faustian deal that would also keep her eternally youthful, actually, her and her entire office staff as many of the same Latina women who worked in her office not only remembered me as an 8 year-old but also looked no different decades later.
It's not that I could say something as brash and dramatic as, "I don't feel pain," because that would be patently untrue, I definitely experience pain, and it's not that I have some sort of weird fetishistic relationship to it, because I don't like pain, and like most rational people, given the choice, would prefer not to suffer it, and I don't have that weird nonsense bravado to proclaim "all pain is an illusion!" since, frankly, when you feel pain, it definitely feels material, boy and how.
But I wonder if my pain experience somehow suits me for endurance running? Now, there have been times when I've been slowed down or had to stop running due to a negative somatosensory something, weakness, owie, etc., no doubt, but maybe the way I feel and cope with pain has/will let me run real, real far?
Thing is, I don't think it's something unique, necessarily rare or something inaccessible by humanity at large. Take, for example, an article in this month's "Runner's World" which details and semi-laments the fact that many more runners now qualify for the Boston Marathon, an event that was in some ways casually considered premiere but has now been elevated to the near-Olympic (in the classical Greek deistic sense, not the modern IOC-bribery sense). Not that it wasn't an elite race before, but in the past it didn't have the same totemic value placed on it by the teeming mass of marathoners who are looking for a life-defining event, a running-reason for being, but the point being that that's a lot of folks who experience pain in a way that doesn't stop them in their tracks (so to speak).
So now the question becomes, how much further (and farther) can I push this special relationship with pain - 50K? 60K? 50 miles? 100K? 100 miles? Somehow, it's weirdly comforting to think that if this ability is innate to all people then it must be within me and therefore accessible, and all that needs doing is the going out and exercising of this trait, to run and run and run.
Or maybe I can just go run another marathon - Long Beach, anyone?
Believe it or don't, like Al Bundy, I played high school football during my freshman and sophomore years. Being the opposite of nimble, I was placed on the offensive and defensive lines, which was a shame because I was also the opposite of big and strong.
The event that I recall took place during my sophomore year, the year I realized that everyone else was still growing while I had stopped. I was (and am) all of 5'6" and 150 pounds, playing center on the defensive line (notice the problem here?) during a practice scrimmage. The ball snapped, my reflexes are pretty swift so I went forward into the grunting, thudding mass of the line, when I felt a body at my knees and another hitting me across the torso making me fall leftward with my arm outstretched. I felt my hand hit someone's smooth, plastic helmet followed by a sudden numbness. The play ended, I sat up, held my left hand in front of me, noticed something amiss, and said, "coach, I think I dislocated my finger"; my little finger was pointing off in a funny direction, and I didn't feel any pain, just a bit of surprise at this new angle that my finger had taken.
The coach sprinted over, maroon cap over his graying hair, dark sunglasses, gray cotton shirt tucked into his too-short maroon shorts in a way that accented his old man's belly and saggy groin (the problem with being a writer: you see too much), skinny old man's extremities all akimbo except for the arm under which he'd tucked his clipboard. He paused for a split second, apprising himself of the situation, then without further question or hesitation grasped my hand and popped the joint back in place. I'd been, if not exactly numb, since I'd known something was wrong, in something like discomfort, but then noted, also with surprise, "huh, it's starting to hurt now." My father took me to the local hospital where x-rays were taken, a splint applied, and ever since then I've had a little more curvature to that particular joint, an extra little bend, and this experience with pain.
Or going back even further into the past: I remember visiting the dentist as a child. Now, I never had the same apprehension on these visits as many of my friends had, which is perhaps the sign of a faulty long-term memory that would otherwise have associated "trip to the dentist" with "drill to the face", or perhaps I just had a different experience with pain.
The dentist's office was nothing particularly special, not geared towards children, no murals of firetrucks and giraffes. The dentist herself was a well-put-together Korean lady, not the kind who would fawn over children. I remember sitting in the chair, staring up into exam light, hearing the drill whine; every so often, if I let out a little whimper or if a tear would well up in one eye, the dentist would say, "tut-tut," and the gasp would stop or the tear would magically roll back. I would, every now and again, feel myself tense up as something was being scraped or drilled or dynamited, notice that I was tensing up, and then making myself relax and open my mouth wider, unlike my siblings, who had to have bite-blocks placed in order for the dentist to work. Years later, as an adult, I would go back to this same dentist since I hadn't known who else to go to, and thinking with mild surprise that she hadn't seemed to have aged. At all. And wondering if her command over my pain had involved some sort of faustian deal that would also keep her eternally youthful, actually, her and her entire office staff as many of the same Latina women who worked in her office not only remembered me as an 8 year-old but also looked no different decades later.
It's not that I could say something as brash and dramatic as, "I don't feel pain," because that would be patently untrue, I definitely experience pain, and it's not that I have some sort of weird fetishistic relationship to it, because I don't like pain, and like most rational people, given the choice, would prefer not to suffer it, and I don't have that weird nonsense bravado to proclaim "all pain is an illusion!" since, frankly, when you feel pain, it definitely feels material, boy and how.
But I wonder if my pain experience somehow suits me for endurance running? Now, there have been times when I've been slowed down or had to stop running due to a negative somatosensory something, weakness, owie, etc., no doubt, but maybe the way I feel and cope with pain has/will let me run real, real far?
Thing is, I don't think it's something unique, necessarily rare or something inaccessible by humanity at large. Take, for example, an article in this month's "Runner's World" which details and semi-laments the fact that many more runners now qualify for the Boston Marathon, an event that was in some ways casually considered premiere but has now been elevated to the near-Olympic (in the classical Greek deistic sense, not the modern IOC-bribery sense). Not that it wasn't an elite race before, but in the past it didn't have the same totemic value placed on it by the teeming mass of marathoners who are looking for a life-defining event, a running-reason for being, but the point being that that's a lot of folks who experience pain in a way that doesn't stop them in their tracks (so to speak).
So now the question becomes, how much further (and farther) can I push this special relationship with pain - 50K? 60K? 50 miles? 100K? 100 miles? Somehow, it's weirdly comforting to think that if this ability is innate to all people then it must be within me and therefore accessible, and all that needs doing is the going out and exercising of this trait, to run and run and run.
Or maybe I can just go run another marathon - Long Beach, anyone?
Monday, March 21, 2011
A Supposedly Fun Thing
I love rain - those who know me are familiar with the fact that I'm never as happy as I am when it's drizzling, pouring, dumping, deluging outside. I mean, after all, without rain we wouldn't have double rainbows all the way across the sky. And for those of you who live in the Southland you know that we had a little sprinkling for the 26th annual L.A. Marathon yesterday.
A gentleman put up a very nice photoblog of the 2010 marathon. To get a sense of this year's marathon, just add water.
Actually, water works nicely as a theme for this experience. For example, I didn't realize that these events were such pee-fests. Seriously. The night before, I realized that I hadn't adequately hydrated during the day so the morning of the race I downed two pints of water and a cup of what turned out to be surprisingly strong coffee, which meant that as soon as I arrived I had to go, and by "go", I mean go wait in an achingly long line for the port-a-potty. During the marathon itself, there were scores of dudes, and invariably they were dudes, some furtive, many more emboldened, leaned towards walls, embankments, posts, whatever, heads down, hands front. The constant rainfall must have made it seem like less of an environmental affront, seeing as how the rain would dilute and wash away such excreta. I myself could never go in front of so many people (I'm shy) and besides, seeing as how a public urination conviction should get you on the Megan's Law list, why risk it? (Although I assume the police had better things to do than arrest a couple of thousand marathoners for public urination.) I've already spent far too much of this post meditating about urinating in public, so onward.
All the stuff people say about these large races seemed to hold true: throngs of people (over 23,000) of all manner of ages, shapes and sizes gathered in a river of humanity (hmm, water metaphor again) waiting for the starting horn. What was perhaps different was the universal groan the crowd let out when the first fat drops of rain started falling right as we began to move to the start, but then we were off.
The course starts by running counter-clockwise around a portion of Dodgers Stadium, with this first little bit curving uphill, everyone determinedly trying to work out their pace, the rhythmic, soft wisk-wisk-wisk of the plastic trash-bag smocks that many people were wearing as rain ponchos (the marathon organizers even suggested that you bring a trash-bag to use for that purpose). And then it's downhill into Chavez Ravine towards Chinatown, with a band playing the first of a number of musical running cliches (Don't Stop Believin', the Rocky theme, Born to Run, hmm, no Running on Empty...), but a point to make about the course is that it's actually kinda hilly. Everyone makes the point that one starts at elevation (Dodgers Stadium) and ends at the ocean (Santa Monica) which means that it is, ultimately, a downhill course, but there's quite a bit of discouraging variation along the way. The painful part of these hills is that unlike interestingly curvy singletrack trails, many of the elevations were extended straightaways, protracted grinds of admittedly gentle, but relentless, grades.
One of the advertising slogans of the L.A. Marathon is that there's a "landmark every mile," with the course going through downtown, Hollywood, Beverly Hills, etc., which seems a bit corny, but in practice I enjoyed it, like when we passed the Grauman's Chinese Theatre (which I remembered as the Mann's Chinese Theatre), where I had watched the original Star Wars as a kid back in 1977. As a native Angeleno, it was actually pleasantly nostalgic to pass these familiar sites this way - after all, the world really does look different when you're on foot.
The rain came in squalls, the spaces between them shortening as the day progressed. Running down the hill from Disney Concert Hall, we passed through an intersection when there was a flash of light. I heard a runner to my right ask his friend, "what was that?" I'd noticed a camera on one of the signals and replied, "red light camera, I think." To my chagrin we heard the boom of thunder couple of seconds later, harbinger of the storm that worsened throughout the morning. I heard someone else sardonically comment to his neighbor, "hey, I thought they say it never rains in L.A." No, my friend, actually, it's that nobody walks in L.A. - although running is apparently acceptable.
True to form, my mood lightened the worse the downpour got. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't always exactly comfortable and the chill made one's muscles ache, but given that I have tendency to overheat I thoroughly enjoyed the cool, and every time another sheet of rain would wallop us I'd find a grin on my face. I've always loved rain; one of my favorite childhood memories is of the 1983 storm that wiped out part of Santa Monica pier. It's not that I liked to play in the rain; I was a fastidious child and didn't like getting all messy playing outdoors, I guess I just liked the mood a stormy sky gave (I was a weird kid). Now, for some reason as an adult I've finally discovered the reason why it's so much fun to jump in puddles. You can also look at it this way: being constantly drenched meant that chafing was much less of a concern.
If you were to try to describe it to, say, an east African villager, you could say that a marathon is a big, urban group run. For giggles. The longest run I'd had before yesterday had been a 20 miler (technically, 19.91 miles, but who's counting?) (well, the GPS, I suppose...), but like I've been saying, if you can run 20, you can run an extra 6.2. The night before was when I began to have my first twinges of self-doubt. Drifting off in to non-sleep (so I guess I actually wasn't drifting off to anywhere), I lay awake thinking about the pain I was having in my right instep, the cramping I'd had in my quads during my twenty-miler, the pre-med student who'd collapsed in cardiac arrest in the 2010 marathon. During the night, however, I began to come up with a plan for the day, the timing for taking gels, plain water versus sports drink, how to pace myself so I wouldn't expend my reserves early, and going through this mental exercise seemed to help diminish some of the anxiety, and I began to think that the pain in my foot would go away once it warmed up (it did), my newfound insights into my body's workings meant that my quads wouldn't cramp (they didn't), and besides, that pre-med student is doing just fine now after resuscitation, induced hypothermia and an ICU stay.
That took care of the pre-race jitters; the run itself was fascinating. In the first few miles of the marathon, I kept checking my GPS watch for my pace, intently slowing myself down or speeding up to match what I hoped I could sustain, but after a little while I had a better sense of how quickly/slowly I was actually going. The mental wranglings one undergoes... it's funny, I tend to be pretty relaxed and non-competitive (losing a lot of competitions as a child translates into a mellow adulthood) but I found that I'd have to tell myself not to try and "beat" the guy running next to me or not to get disappointed when the woman who looked old enough to be Yoda's mother would chug past me, light on her toes. I had some really blissed-out moments: running out of Beverly Hills and into Century City (hmm, escaping the materialstic world of the wealthy?) (not, I suppose, that Century City is exactly a slum), I heard someone shout out in encouragement, "you can do this, just think about the goal!!" That observation prompted the thought, no, one can't simply think about the goal, the termination of the run, but that I had somehow to enjoy that moment, in and of itself, engaging in a run, this rain and chill. On the other hand were some down moments: rather than bringing a sense of relief, mile 13 in Hollywood, made me think, just for a moment, exhaustedly, I've got to do this again?
It was mile 20 where I seemed to achieve mental running equipoise, since that's the longest I'd run prior; it also felt like the equilibrated point in the sense that the rest would really be downhill (but not in the literal sense - read the stuff about long, uphill straightaways above). The common wisdom is that the last 6.2 miles (10K) of the marathon is a different world unto its own - that's surely because we humans have learned to think in decimals, so twenty being a multiple of 10 probably gives some sense of closure, but that last 6.2 really did seem different.
Shortly after the 20 mile mark, there was a booth for Natural Ice Beer, with a smiling man handing out little cups of suds, not much, the size of the cup that you use to swish and spit at the dentist's. I heard the hipsters running behind me saying to each other, "no, it's still a little too early for that," whereas all I could think of was "what a great way to blunt the pain!" (I shoulda gotten another cup. One for each leg.)
You get into the VA at that point, where some grizzled looking Vietnam-era vets man the hydration tables. When I swerved towards the trash can and missed throwing my paper cup in, a grizzled, homeless-looking vet chuckled and said, "naw, man, you don't got to worry 'bout 'dat!" I grinned back and picked up the cup and chucked it in the trash. Which reminds me: I somehow couldn't bring myself to throw my paper cups on the ground. I realize that in terms of marathon-manners, it's permissible and even accepted that one would toss one's refuse on the ground, seeing as how one has to break world records and all one can't trifle with the niceties of dealing with one's own trash, but I somehow couldn't bring myself to litter - it's probably the same reason I couldn't bring myself to pee in public. Wandering off course to throw away my trash probably added a half mile to my total run (oh, wait - the GPS actually seems to say that I added 0.27 miles to my run - good to know).
The last leg of the race spanned from Brentwood to Santa Monica with a long, endless-feeling slope up before the final short drop down to the beach. This area formed part of my old college stomping grounds - for some reason there was a period of time when we would celebrate all birthdays with a trip to the Brentwood Cheesecake Factory, the habit of which contributed to my present need to run a lot - and running through the neighborhood was a treat. However, it was on this last little stretch of 5 miles or so through West L.A. and Brentwood where the spectators started to wear on me.
It's not that I hate crowds (well, they kinda make me feel uncomfortable, but not agoraphobically so), and I actually very much appreciated the fact that so many people came out and stood in the rain for hours, not just the volunteers who handed us cups of water and orange wedges, but also so they could high-five us and mispronounce my name ("you can do it, 'Ty Kim'!" - yo, it rhymes with "day", like "Taye Diggs") (I would've corrected them if I didn't need my breath to not die). There were all manner of colorful locals, like the one poorly-dentitioned woman near Echo Park who cheered us on and said, "it's great that you can do this, makes me feel bad for just drinking beer last night," to which I replied, "I did too!", the young Armenian priest who seemed to reappear at several points along the way, the middle-aged transvestite cheerleaders in West Hollywood I wanted to high-five but felt too shy to.
During that final leg, though, is when, in attempts to be encouraging, people started saying things like, "keep it up, just four more miles to go!" when it turned out that they meant 4.6 miles, so when the 4 mile marker came up it felt like that much farther (and further), or "you're almost to the top and then it's all downhill from here!" when the long slope meant that there wasn't really a peak, and the downhill portion just felt flattish. Encouragement from the spectators began to feel more like a taunt at that point with exhaustion setting in along with the colder winds whipping in off the Pacific, which meant, hey, we're almost there. And then, finally, the left turn southbound on to Ocean Avenue, the real final stretch and the final mile to the finish line.
A mile is a surprisingly lengthy measure of distance, which may seem funny-sounding considering we'd just run 25.2 of them, but Ocean Ave. seemed to stretch on and on, and it began to feel like I was a contestant in the novella "The Long Walk" by Richard Bachman (a.k.a. Stephen King), stumbling on in to my own psychosis, when finally, in the gray distance, you could make out the orange finish line banner. It felt like I kept running and running while the banner grew no closer, the rain and wind becoming more stinging, and it felt like all of the other runners started surging past me while I kept the same monotonous pitter-pat pace (one sonofab - well, it's a family show, so you'll have to guess son of a what - had decided he'd save up his efforts until the very end and sprinted, yes, sprinted down the last mile while the rest of us stared disgustedly at his back - or at least I stared disgustedly at his back). For some reason the event organizers had placed a penultimate chip-timer strip a hundred yards or so from the finish line which confused me for a second, wait, do I hit the "stop" button on my timer here? when I noticed the final timer strip at the finish line itself ahead of me, and then it was over, across the line, the chip-timer squawked and I hit my GPS button. Done!
Sort of. It turns out that there's actually about a mile from the finish line of the marathon down to the finish line festival pavilion where one's drop bag is taken, where one is reunited with one's family, and most importantly, where the Michelob Ultra beer tent (free beer to each runner) (while supplies last) was, and that mile, that actual final mile, was where the real pain began.
Now, if the weather were fine, it'd be difficult enough to have to try and walk another full mile, but with the rain and wind soaking and gusting everyone who'd at that point stopped running (and therefore stopped generating heat), there were real problems. I received one of those mylar space blankets before I received a finisher's medal (funny thing; you know how I've been talking endlessly about running ultras and how that was my real goal, but that I should probably finish a regular ol' marathon first? Well, a little part of me had thought not to bother with receiving a medal just for finishing when the real target was 50K/50 miles/100K, but I realized that it'd be peevish/needlessly contrarian to decline one) (and besides, the little old lady who hung it around my neck made direct eye contact with me) (and notice? "peevish" has "pee" in it - full circle!) and wrapped it around my shoulders but the real cold started setting in at that point, and now with a wet cap and sopped shoes I squelched on for what felt like another 20 miles. The crowd was oddly subdued; two lines of spectators had formed a sort of corral down which a column of runners now walked, but a race official had instructed everyone that they could walk on either side of this lane, but that we needed to keep moving. Normally, I imagine that there are finishers flopped down on the grass, laughing and chatting excitedly about their accomplishment, but rivulets of rainwater streamed everywhere, and instead of excited runners there was a tall, gaunt, mustachioed race official directing people into the warming station they'd improvised in the lobby of the Georgian Hotel. The L.A. Times' sports blog noted that thousands of runners were evaluated for hypothermia, with 25 transported to local hospitals for treatment.
The festival pavilion was wet and muddy, like a marathoning Woodstock, only less cheerful (less PCP, too), with family and friends crowded and huddled under the tents. An ice-cold Michelob Ultra was the last thing I had in mind, Lance Armstrong's endorsement of the product notwithstanding (dude, I realize that your accomplishments are pretty awesome, that money may be tight since you've retired from your cycling career, but seriously, is that the best your agent got you? Shilling for low carb beer!?). I staggered over to the bag-drop area, and I began to think a series of items: this must be what hypothermia feels like, I have to change out of wet clothes which would be one of the best things to counteract hypothermia, and that I had a dry pullover fleece in my drop bag - actually, it was the only thing in my drop bag. My wife finally found me at the bag-drop, where I was pawing stupidly through the bags, unable to locate mine, wracked with shivers, lips blue, speech slowed. The friend she came with, who was waiting for her boyfriend to finish, gave us the keys to the ancient minivan they'd driven up in, and a little bit later I was finally dressed in the semi-dry attire that my wife had thankfully brought with her, warm cups of soup from the Cuban restaurant a few doors down fogging the windows and finally taking the chill out of my marrow.
It was probably around mile 12 or 13 that I began to repeat one mantra, "clear eyes and full hearts can't lose," which was tempered by a thought I'd plagiarized from an essay by David Foster Wallace, which was that this thing, this marathon, was a supposedly fun thing I'd never do again, that perhaps I'd view this run through the lenses of a bucket-list, off from which I could cross it once I'd finished this one. But today, with the little whimper that's come to accompany any required physical action (don't ask me to climb or descend stairs. I'm so sore and move so slowly - remember the steamroller scene in the first Austin Powers movie? I'd be crushed, but it wouldn't be for lack of trying, I just can't move quickly), I sat down at the computer and yes, started this post, but also started looking up the Long Beach Marathon, which takes place this October, and ultramarathons that take place in California, I wonder if I could persuade my running buddies to go on one of these...
A gentleman put up a very nice photoblog of the 2010 marathon. To get a sense of this year's marathon, just add water.
Actually, water works nicely as a theme for this experience. For example, I didn't realize that these events were such pee-fests. Seriously. The night before, I realized that I hadn't adequately hydrated during the day so the morning of the race I downed two pints of water and a cup of what turned out to be surprisingly strong coffee, which meant that as soon as I arrived I had to go, and by "go", I mean go wait in an achingly long line for the port-a-potty. During the marathon itself, there were scores of dudes, and invariably they were dudes, some furtive, many more emboldened, leaned towards walls, embankments, posts, whatever, heads down, hands front. The constant rainfall must have made it seem like less of an environmental affront, seeing as how the rain would dilute and wash away such excreta. I myself could never go in front of so many people (I'm shy) and besides, seeing as how a public urination conviction should get you on the Megan's Law list, why risk it? (Although I assume the police had better things to do than arrest a couple of thousand marathoners for public urination.) I've already spent far too much of this post meditating about urinating in public, so onward.
All the stuff people say about these large races seemed to hold true: throngs of people (over 23,000) of all manner of ages, shapes and sizes gathered in a river of humanity (hmm, water metaphor again) waiting for the starting horn. What was perhaps different was the universal groan the crowd let out when the first fat drops of rain started falling right as we began to move to the start, but then we were off.
The course starts by running counter-clockwise around a portion of Dodgers Stadium, with this first little bit curving uphill, everyone determinedly trying to work out their pace, the rhythmic, soft wisk-wisk-wisk of the plastic trash-bag smocks that many people were wearing as rain ponchos (the marathon organizers even suggested that you bring a trash-bag to use for that purpose). And then it's downhill into Chavez Ravine towards Chinatown, with a band playing the first of a number of musical running cliches (Don't Stop Believin', the Rocky theme, Born to Run, hmm, no Running on Empty...), but a point to make about the course is that it's actually kinda hilly. Everyone makes the point that one starts at elevation (Dodgers Stadium) and ends at the ocean (Santa Monica) which means that it is, ultimately, a downhill course, but there's quite a bit of discouraging variation along the way. The painful part of these hills is that unlike interestingly curvy singletrack trails, many of the elevations were extended straightaways, protracted grinds of admittedly gentle, but relentless, grades.
One of the advertising slogans of the L.A. Marathon is that there's a "landmark every mile," with the course going through downtown, Hollywood, Beverly Hills, etc., which seems a bit corny, but in practice I enjoyed it, like when we passed the Grauman's Chinese Theatre (which I remembered as the Mann's Chinese Theatre), where I had watched the original Star Wars as a kid back in 1977. As a native Angeleno, it was actually pleasantly nostalgic to pass these familiar sites this way - after all, the world really does look different when you're on foot.
The rain came in squalls, the spaces between them shortening as the day progressed. Running down the hill from Disney Concert Hall, we passed through an intersection when there was a flash of light. I heard a runner to my right ask his friend, "what was that?" I'd noticed a camera on one of the signals and replied, "red light camera, I think." To my chagrin we heard the boom of thunder couple of seconds later, harbinger of the storm that worsened throughout the morning. I heard someone else sardonically comment to his neighbor, "hey, I thought they say it never rains in L.A." No, my friend, actually, it's that nobody walks in L.A. - although running is apparently acceptable.
True to form, my mood lightened the worse the downpour got. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't always exactly comfortable and the chill made one's muscles ache, but given that I have tendency to overheat I thoroughly enjoyed the cool, and every time another sheet of rain would wallop us I'd find a grin on my face. I've always loved rain; one of my favorite childhood memories is of the 1983 storm that wiped out part of Santa Monica pier. It's not that I liked to play in the rain; I was a fastidious child and didn't like getting all messy playing outdoors, I guess I just liked the mood a stormy sky gave (I was a weird kid). Now, for some reason as an adult I've finally discovered the reason why it's so much fun to jump in puddles. You can also look at it this way: being constantly drenched meant that chafing was much less of a concern.
If you were to try to describe it to, say, an east African villager, you could say that a marathon is a big, urban group run. For giggles. The longest run I'd had before yesterday had been a 20 miler (technically, 19.91 miles, but who's counting?) (well, the GPS, I suppose...), but like I've been saying, if you can run 20, you can run an extra 6.2. The night before was when I began to have my first twinges of self-doubt. Drifting off in to non-sleep (so I guess I actually wasn't drifting off to anywhere), I lay awake thinking about the pain I was having in my right instep, the cramping I'd had in my quads during my twenty-miler, the pre-med student who'd collapsed in cardiac arrest in the 2010 marathon. During the night, however, I began to come up with a plan for the day, the timing for taking gels, plain water versus sports drink, how to pace myself so I wouldn't expend my reserves early, and going through this mental exercise seemed to help diminish some of the anxiety, and I began to think that the pain in my foot would go away once it warmed up (it did), my newfound insights into my body's workings meant that my quads wouldn't cramp (they didn't), and besides, that pre-med student is doing just fine now after resuscitation, induced hypothermia and an ICU stay.
That took care of the pre-race jitters; the run itself was fascinating. In the first few miles of the marathon, I kept checking my GPS watch for my pace, intently slowing myself down or speeding up to match what I hoped I could sustain, but after a little while I had a better sense of how quickly/slowly I was actually going. The mental wranglings one undergoes... it's funny, I tend to be pretty relaxed and non-competitive (losing a lot of competitions as a child translates into a mellow adulthood) but I found that I'd have to tell myself not to try and "beat" the guy running next to me or not to get disappointed when the woman who looked old enough to be Yoda's mother would chug past me, light on her toes. I had some really blissed-out moments: running out of Beverly Hills and into Century City (hmm, escaping the materialstic world of the wealthy?) (not, I suppose, that Century City is exactly a slum), I heard someone shout out in encouragement, "you can do this, just think about the goal!!" That observation prompted the thought, no, one can't simply think about the goal, the termination of the run, but that I had somehow to enjoy that moment, in and of itself, engaging in a run, this rain and chill. On the other hand were some down moments: rather than bringing a sense of relief, mile 13 in Hollywood, made me think, just for a moment, exhaustedly, I've got to do this again?
It was mile 20 where I seemed to achieve mental running equipoise, since that's the longest I'd run prior; it also felt like the equilibrated point in the sense that the rest would really be downhill (but not in the literal sense - read the stuff about long, uphill straightaways above). The common wisdom is that the last 6.2 miles (10K) of the marathon is a different world unto its own - that's surely because we humans have learned to think in decimals, so twenty being a multiple of 10 probably gives some sense of closure, but that last 6.2 really did seem different.
Shortly after the 20 mile mark, there was a booth for Natural Ice Beer, with a smiling man handing out little cups of suds, not much, the size of the cup that you use to swish and spit at the dentist's. I heard the hipsters running behind me saying to each other, "no, it's still a little too early for that," whereas all I could think of was "what a great way to blunt the pain!" (I shoulda gotten another cup. One for each leg.)
You get into the VA at that point, where some grizzled looking Vietnam-era vets man the hydration tables. When I swerved towards the trash can and missed throwing my paper cup in, a grizzled, homeless-looking vet chuckled and said, "naw, man, you don't got to worry 'bout 'dat!" I grinned back and picked up the cup and chucked it in the trash. Which reminds me: I somehow couldn't bring myself to throw my paper cups on the ground. I realize that in terms of marathon-manners, it's permissible and even accepted that one would toss one's refuse on the ground, seeing as how one has to break world records and all one can't trifle with the niceties of dealing with one's own trash, but I somehow couldn't bring myself to litter - it's probably the same reason I couldn't bring myself to pee in public. Wandering off course to throw away my trash probably added a half mile to my total run (oh, wait - the GPS actually seems to say that I added 0.27 miles to my run - good to know).
The last leg of the race spanned from Brentwood to Santa Monica with a long, endless-feeling slope up before the final short drop down to the beach. This area formed part of my old college stomping grounds - for some reason there was a period of time when we would celebrate all birthdays with a trip to the Brentwood Cheesecake Factory, the habit of which contributed to my present need to run a lot - and running through the neighborhood was a treat. However, it was on this last little stretch of 5 miles or so through West L.A. and Brentwood where the spectators started to wear on me.
It's not that I hate crowds (well, they kinda make me feel uncomfortable, but not agoraphobically so), and I actually very much appreciated the fact that so many people came out and stood in the rain for hours, not just the volunteers who handed us cups of water and orange wedges, but also so they could high-five us and mispronounce my name ("you can do it, 'Ty Kim'!" - yo, it rhymes with "day", like "Taye Diggs") (I would've corrected them if I didn't need my breath to not die). There were all manner of colorful locals, like the one poorly-dentitioned woman near Echo Park who cheered us on and said, "it's great that you can do this, makes me feel bad for just drinking beer last night," to which I replied, "I did too!", the young Armenian priest who seemed to reappear at several points along the way, the middle-aged transvestite cheerleaders in West Hollywood I wanted to high-five but felt too shy to.
During that final leg, though, is when, in attempts to be encouraging, people started saying things like, "keep it up, just four more miles to go!" when it turned out that they meant 4.6 miles, so when the 4 mile marker came up it felt like that much farther (and further), or "you're almost to the top and then it's all downhill from here!" when the long slope meant that there wasn't really a peak, and the downhill portion just felt flattish. Encouragement from the spectators began to feel more like a taunt at that point with exhaustion setting in along with the colder winds whipping in off the Pacific, which meant, hey, we're almost there. And then, finally, the left turn southbound on to Ocean Avenue, the real final stretch and the final mile to the finish line.
A mile is a surprisingly lengthy measure of distance, which may seem funny-sounding considering we'd just run 25.2 of them, but Ocean Ave. seemed to stretch on and on, and it began to feel like I was a contestant in the novella "The Long Walk" by Richard Bachman (a.k.a. Stephen King), stumbling on in to my own psychosis, when finally, in the gray distance, you could make out the orange finish line banner. It felt like I kept running and running while the banner grew no closer, the rain and wind becoming more stinging, and it felt like all of the other runners started surging past me while I kept the same monotonous pitter-pat pace (one sonofab - well, it's a family show, so you'll have to guess son of a what - had decided he'd save up his efforts until the very end and sprinted, yes, sprinted down the last mile while the rest of us stared disgustedly at his back - or at least I stared disgustedly at his back). For some reason the event organizers had placed a penultimate chip-timer strip a hundred yards or so from the finish line which confused me for a second, wait, do I hit the "stop" button on my timer here? when I noticed the final timer strip at the finish line itself ahead of me, and then it was over, across the line, the chip-timer squawked and I hit my GPS button. Done!
Sort of. It turns out that there's actually about a mile from the finish line of the marathon down to the finish line festival pavilion where one's drop bag is taken, where one is reunited with one's family, and most importantly, where the Michelob Ultra beer tent (free beer to each runner) (while supplies last) was, and that mile, that actual final mile, was where the real pain began.
Now, if the weather were fine, it'd be difficult enough to have to try and walk another full mile, but with the rain and wind soaking and gusting everyone who'd at that point stopped running (and therefore stopped generating heat), there were real problems. I received one of those mylar space blankets before I received a finisher's medal (funny thing; you know how I've been talking endlessly about running ultras and how that was my real goal, but that I should probably finish a regular ol' marathon first? Well, a little part of me had thought not to bother with receiving a medal just for finishing when the real target was 50K/50 miles/100K, but I realized that it'd be peevish/needlessly contrarian to decline one) (and besides, the little old lady who hung it around my neck made direct eye contact with me) (and notice? "peevish" has "pee" in it - full circle!) and wrapped it around my shoulders but the real cold started setting in at that point, and now with a wet cap and sopped shoes I squelched on for what felt like another 20 miles. The crowd was oddly subdued; two lines of spectators had formed a sort of corral down which a column of runners now walked, but a race official had instructed everyone that they could walk on either side of this lane, but that we needed to keep moving. Normally, I imagine that there are finishers flopped down on the grass, laughing and chatting excitedly about their accomplishment, but rivulets of rainwater streamed everywhere, and instead of excited runners there was a tall, gaunt, mustachioed race official directing people into the warming station they'd improvised in the lobby of the Georgian Hotel. The L.A. Times' sports blog noted that thousands of runners were evaluated for hypothermia, with 25 transported to local hospitals for treatment.
The festival pavilion was wet and muddy, like a marathoning Woodstock, only less cheerful (less PCP, too), with family and friends crowded and huddled under the tents. An ice-cold Michelob Ultra was the last thing I had in mind, Lance Armstrong's endorsement of the product notwithstanding (dude, I realize that your accomplishments are pretty awesome, that money may be tight since you've retired from your cycling career, but seriously, is that the best your agent got you? Shilling for low carb beer!?). I staggered over to the bag-drop area, and I began to think a series of items: this must be what hypothermia feels like, I have to change out of wet clothes which would be one of the best things to counteract hypothermia, and that I had a dry pullover fleece in my drop bag - actually, it was the only thing in my drop bag. My wife finally found me at the bag-drop, where I was pawing stupidly through the bags, unable to locate mine, wracked with shivers, lips blue, speech slowed. The friend she came with, who was waiting for her boyfriend to finish, gave us the keys to the ancient minivan they'd driven up in, and a little bit later I was finally dressed in the semi-dry attire that my wife had thankfully brought with her, warm cups of soup from the Cuban restaurant a few doors down fogging the windows and finally taking the chill out of my marrow.
It was probably around mile 12 or 13 that I began to repeat one mantra, "clear eyes and full hearts can't lose," which was tempered by a thought I'd plagiarized from an essay by David Foster Wallace, which was that this thing, this marathon, was a supposedly fun thing I'd never do again, that perhaps I'd view this run through the lenses of a bucket-list, off from which I could cross it once I'd finished this one. But today, with the little whimper that's come to accompany any required physical action (don't ask me to climb or descend stairs. I'm so sore and move so slowly - remember the steamroller scene in the first Austin Powers movie? I'd be crushed, but it wouldn't be for lack of trying, I just can't move quickly), I sat down at the computer and yes, started this post, but also started looking up the Long Beach Marathon, which takes place this October, and ultramarathons that take place in California, I wonder if I could persuade my running buddies to go on one of these...
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Short Jog in the Soggy South
A brief, placeholder-update with just my results from today's L.A. Marathon:
Chip-Time
26.2 mi. 4 hr.:20 min.:43 sec. 9:57 pace.
GPS-Time
26.47 mi. 4 hr.:17 min.:54 sec. 9:44 pace. 3,135 Calories
Dangit - I thought it'd be more calories...
Chip-Time
26.2 mi. 4 hr.:20 min.:43 sec. 9:57 pace.
GPS-Time
26.47 mi. 4 hr.:17 min.:54 sec. 9:44 pace. 3,135 Calories
Dangit - I thought it'd be more calories...
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Ow ow ow ow ow...
I think I'm starting to understand the allure of this entire "testing one's own limits" thing, as I did a lot of it this past weekend, the cumulative effect of which has resulted in a large-ish blister on the sole of my right foot, sore quadriceps (both sides), assent to have a dude touch my legs for a sports-massage at today's 5K, and the continued deepening of a perpetual, wicked farmer's tan.
Saturday's Run: Where My Dawgs At - No, Seriously, Why Am I Running These Distances Alone?
19.91 mi. 3 hr.:6 min.:52 sec. 9:23 pace. 2,456 calories.
First off, the distance was pleasantly symmetric (1991 was also a pretty good year), and although some might think, gosh, it was so close to an even 20, my reply is that, along the line of reasoning that I've had that if I can run 3, I can run 5, if I can run 5, I can run 8, if I can run 8, I can run 12, if I can run 12, I can run 16, etc., then the extra 0.09 miles don't worry me. I just ran two laps around the Newport Back Bay, once clockwise, once counter clockwise, for a near-twenty, and I did it alone, which put my entire last post about the joys of running solo to the test.
I learned a lot about myself on this run; the first 3/4 was fairly easy, and then I had problems. One of the (solvable) problems is that I now need to use Bodyglide on my lower back, where my fuel belt rubs (I now have kind of a fuel belt tramp stamp/abrasion), and between my thighs (in the crotchular area) where I've been afflicted with chub rub. My quads started cramping on the last 4-5 miles, and I realized that I need to do some sort of electrolyte replacement when I go above 16 miles, given that when I perspire my skin, roughly speaking, becomes rimed with salt, like a margarita glass. I guess a sports-drink or salt tablets would help, alternatively, I could just start licking the salt off my arms, but that might cause unease with my fellow hobbyists. The day ended with a lot of groaning, and the giant foot blister described above.
Sunday's Run: Murrieta 5K 2011!
(Per my GPS and not the official race record) 3.03 mi. 22 min.:46 sec. 7:30 pace.
First of all, it was a terrific event beautifully orchestrated by Emili Steele and her band of merry prankst... well, more like band of merry fundraising event organizers, but you get the idea. Actually, it was my first ever race! And perhaps it wasn't the best idea to run it the day after my long run and the aforementioned blistering, etc., and the cold I continue to fight off, and the electrolyte abnormality I still probably have, and the sun got in my eyes, and I still have to get ready for the L.A. Marathon, you get the point. Since it was my first race (ever), I was a bit shy and ended up at the back of the pack at the starting line, which required a lot of dodging walkers, joggers, baby strollers (there was a triple-wide), etc. in order to get running, but it felt good, it made me feel like a real athlete, to keep passing all of these other runners... that is, until I realized that my vision was tunneling, everyone else kept smiling and chattering and going out of their way to high-five when I could barely stay on my feet, oh, you get the point. Sean Bush was awesome, finishing in the top ten! Me, I was just happy to finish.
And now, I have to have some serious alone-time with the giant blister that's on the sole of my right foot. It's seriously starting to develop its own personality, like Master-Blaster, or that weird stomach-creature in Total Recall...
Saturday's Run: Where My Dawgs At - No, Seriously, Why Am I Running These Distances Alone?
19.91 mi. 3 hr.:6 min.:52 sec. 9:23 pace. 2,456 calories.
First off, the distance was pleasantly symmetric (1991 was also a pretty good year), and although some might think, gosh, it was so close to an even 20, my reply is that, along the line of reasoning that I've had that if I can run 3, I can run 5, if I can run 5, I can run 8, if I can run 8, I can run 12, if I can run 12, I can run 16, etc., then the extra 0.09 miles don't worry me. I just ran two laps around the Newport Back Bay, once clockwise, once counter clockwise, for a near-twenty, and I did it alone, which put my entire last post about the joys of running solo to the test.
I learned a lot about myself on this run; the first 3/4 was fairly easy, and then I had problems. One of the (solvable) problems is that I now need to use Bodyglide on my lower back, where my fuel belt rubs (I now have kind of a fuel belt tramp stamp/abrasion), and between my thighs (in the crotchular area) where I've been afflicted with chub rub. My quads started cramping on the last 4-5 miles, and I realized that I need to do some sort of electrolyte replacement when I go above 16 miles, given that when I perspire my skin, roughly speaking, becomes rimed with salt, like a margarita glass. I guess a sports-drink or salt tablets would help, alternatively, I could just start licking the salt off my arms, but that might cause unease with my fellow hobbyists. The day ended with a lot of groaning, and the giant foot blister described above.
Sunday's Run: Murrieta 5K 2011!
(Per my GPS and not the official race record) 3.03 mi. 22 min.:46 sec. 7:30 pace.
First of all, it was a terrific event beautifully orchestrated by Emili Steele and her band of merry prankst... well, more like band of merry fundraising event organizers, but you get the idea. Actually, it was my first ever race! And perhaps it wasn't the best idea to run it the day after my long run and the aforementioned blistering, etc., and the cold I continue to fight off, and the electrolyte abnormality I still probably have, and the sun got in my eyes, and I still have to get ready for the L.A. Marathon, you get the point. Since it was my first race (ever), I was a bit shy and ended up at the back of the pack at the starting line, which required a lot of dodging walkers, joggers, baby strollers (there was a triple-wide), etc. in order to get running, but it felt good, it made me feel like a real athlete, to keep passing all of these other runners... that is, until I realized that my vision was tunneling, everyone else kept smiling and chattering and going out of their way to high-five when I could barely stay on my feet, oh, you get the point. Sean Bush was awesome, finishing in the top ten! Me, I was just happy to finish.
And now, I have to have some serious alone-time with the giant blister that's on the sole of my right foot. It's seriously starting to develop its own personality, like Master-Blaster, or that weird stomach-creature in Total Recall...
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
We Think Big Thoughts
Running is an activity best done in groups, or at least that's what all the cool kids are saying these days. But there's a meditative, transcendent quality to running a distance alone. Like, I wonder what Pheidippides was thinking about all of those long, lonely miles, I mean, besides, "ow ow ow ow ow ow ow...."
Which is funny because running is, by its nature, physical; maybe it's when we're embodied in the mind-free rhythmicity of running that we're freed to think Big Thoughts.
Sample: our memories are plastic, malleable, suggestible, not only can we forget, we can remember it wrong. So what happens to us when our memories become virtual and accessible - does my iPhone make me less human, more than human, or just more annoying when you're trying to engage me in a conversation? What happens to me as a person? Are you right because you say you are? What, or who, arbitrates the past? Is there a threshold at which we are no longer able to opt out of a technology, or is it a smeary continuum? When will google become self aware? Does that just mean that google googles itself? What happens when I forget? How do I forget? What happens when we can't forget? What's Whitney Houston saying when she asks how do I know if he really loves me?
Maybe gasping for air on these runs is just making me hypoxic.
Supa-Speedy Solo Cinco Que
3.25 mi. 24 min.:10 sec. 7:26 pace.
Is It Hypoxia, or Is It Memorex?
7.58 mi. 1 hr.:3 min.:56 sec. 8:26 pace.
Which is funny because running is, by its nature, physical; maybe it's when we're embodied in the mind-free rhythmicity of running that we're freed to think Big Thoughts.
Sample: our memories are plastic, malleable, suggestible, not only can we forget, we can remember it wrong. So what happens to us when our memories become virtual and accessible - does my iPhone make me less human, more than human, or just more annoying when you're trying to engage me in a conversation? What happens to me as a person? Are you right because you say you are? What, or who, arbitrates the past? Is there a threshold at which we are no longer able to opt out of a technology, or is it a smeary continuum? When will google become self aware? Does that just mean that google googles itself? What happens when I forget? How do I forget? What happens when we can't forget? What's Whitney Houston saying when she asks how do I know if he really loves me?
Maybe gasping for air on these runs is just making me hypoxic.
Supa-Speedy Solo Cinco Que
3.25 mi. 24 min.:10 sec. 7:26 pace.
Is It Hypoxia, or Is It Memorex?
7.58 mi. 1 hr.:3 min.:56 sec. 8:26 pace.
Monday, February 21, 2011
Because Running Is Cheaper Than Therapy...
Worked the overnight shift with the overnight crue (who were great; it's just that pesky circadian rhythm..)...
Awokened this morning to a consultation request that'll require solutions to both immigration and health care reform (I'll get right on that...)...
The microwave stopped working (yes, the warranty's out...)...
Today's the day we have to meet with our accountant (scheduled to end right during rush hour traffic...)...
And during the first few steps of today's brief run what came to mind was, damn, it feels good to move...
Or Maybe Not, Once You Factor In Shoes, a GPS Watch and Heart Rate Monitor, Chafing-Free Technical Clothes, Spray-Tanner to Remedy That Crazy Farmer's Tan, Race Registration, Ibuprofen...
2.65 mi. 22 min.:24 sec. 8:27 pace.
Awokened this morning to a consultation request that'll require solutions to both immigration and health care reform (I'll get right on that...)...
The microwave stopped working (yes, the warranty's out...)...
Today's the day we have to meet with our accountant (scheduled to end right during rush hour traffic...)...
And during the first few steps of today's brief run what came to mind was, damn, it feels good to move...
Or Maybe Not, Once You Factor In Shoes, a GPS Watch and Heart Rate Monitor, Chafing-Free Technical Clothes, Spray-Tanner to Remedy That Crazy Farmer's Tan, Race Registration, Ibuprofen...
2.65 mi. 22 min.:24 sec. 8:27 pace.
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
The Great Indoors, or, I Have a Vision - Televsion
I've been running in the gym a lot for the past couple of weeks so I could kill two birds with one stone, work out while keeping up on the news in Egypt and the rest of the Middle East, but sometimes my plans don't work out - some days, rather than having CNN on the televisions, well, let's just say that I end up watching more Oprah than any fully employed straight man should be admitting to (did you know that Susan Lucci has been playing her role as Erica Kane on All My Children for over 40 years? well, I do now).
But besides affording me an opportunity to keep up with current events and cultural milestones, running indoors lets me work on my running form. I can dial in the speed, time and incline on the treadmill and see how my form changes: that's how I first started working on a midfoot-strike stride, falling forward for hill-climbs (unfortunately, the treadmills at the gym don't have a descent angle function), where I experimented with sock-wearing with my current pair of shoes - it's kinda like a running lab.
And besides, Oprah's on!
Hats Off To You, Susan Lucci
3.24 mi. 30 min. 9:15 pace.
But besides affording me an opportunity to keep up with current events and cultural milestones, running indoors lets me work on my running form. I can dial in the speed, time and incline on the treadmill and see how my form changes: that's how I first started working on a midfoot-strike stride, falling forward for hill-climbs (unfortunately, the treadmills at the gym don't have a descent angle function), where I experimented with sock-wearing with my current pair of shoes - it's kinda like a running lab.
And besides, Oprah's on!
Hats Off To You, Susan Lucci
3.24 mi. 30 min. 9:15 pace.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Emergency Mediatheque
If you've known me for a while, you may recall that I have writerly notions - after all, I chose to major in English because of John Keats, who was a physician (and died of tuberculosis; I'd like the lasting influence on literature, the coughing up of blood, not so much). Well, actually, rather than solely publications, I guess my ambitions are a little more generally media-related, since I'd like to be the Sanjay Gupta of NPR, given that I have a face for radio and all.
I feel a bit sorry for other niched authorial classes; for example, I pity Anthony Bourdain, who, as we know, is the Tae Kim of food writers. Anyway, I continue to expand my little empire of orphaned, vaguely emergency medicine, or writing, or running, related blogs, and while running today (my, how the mind wanders!) I came up with some more ideas:
The Reluctant Hipster (okay, so this one has nothing to do with emergency medicine, running, or writing, but I liked the ring of it)
Writers Who Work Their Jobby-Jobs Because They Choose To (yeah, not really)
Emergelicious (...)
Hill Associated With Track
4.95 mi. 41 min.:36 sec. 8:24 pace.
I feel a bit sorry for other niched authorial classes; for example, I pity Anthony Bourdain, who, as we know, is the Tae Kim of food writers. Anyway, I continue to expand my little empire of orphaned, vaguely emergency medicine, or writing, or running, related blogs, and while running today (my, how the mind wanders!) I came up with some more ideas:
The Reluctant Hipster (okay, so this one has nothing to do with emergency medicine, running, or writing, but I liked the ring of it)
Writers Who Work Their Jobby-Jobs Because They Choose To (yeah, not really)
Emergelicious (...)
Hill Associated With Track
4.95 mi. 41 min.:36 sec. 8:24 pace.
Saturday, February 5, 2011
The World Looks Different On Foot
So on my evening run I'm going through the cross-walk, and at the intersection, just starting to go in the opposite direction, I see a red Porsche 911 convertible with the top down; at the wheel is a man wearing an Evel Knievel-style Stars-and-Stripes helmet, aviator shades, and in the back is his young daughter, maybe 8 or so, with a frilly frilled helmet on as well, both skinny little arms raised above her head, feeling the air, both of them with giant grins on their faces.
I shoulda yelled, "hooray, the economy is back!"
Counterclockwise Run
6.51 mi. 53 min.:4 sec. 8:09 pace.
I shoulda yelled, "hooray, the economy is back!"
Counterclockwise Run
6.51 mi. 53 min.:4 sec. 8:09 pace.
Monday, January 31, 2011
2B2B
Well, friends and neighbors, it's been a while, but I'm afraid my job, meaning my jobby-job, meaning my day-job (meaning my night, weekend, holiday-job) has kept me 2B2B - Too Busy To Blog.
Well? Whaddaya think? "2B2B" - think it'll catch on?
Here's a photo from a nice run I took this past fall... when I had time for nice runs...
Well? Whaddaya think? "2B2B" - think it'll catch on?
Here's a photo from a nice run I took this past fall... when I had time for nice runs...
Oops! Just kidding, that's just a really, really cute picture of rhinoceroses my wife stole from some website. Cute!!
Here's the real pic I took:
Wednesday, January 19, 2011
This I Believe... Um, That I Believe...
So my e-mail signature line keeps growing, and it's kinda pointless; my real hope is that someday I'll just be able to sign my name, Tae, and people will just know who I am, like Seal, or Moses.
Anyway, in a recent interview with GQ Ryan Gosling (he was in The Notebook, although he's been in better movies like Half Nelson, Lars and the Real Girl, and Blue Valentine) notes that he and his mother have always been believers, that is, that they've always had a sense of the transcendent. He then proceeds to take the reporter to not just one, but two magic shows in Los Angeles, and also mentions that one of his favorite places in Southern California is Disneyland. I guess I, too, have always been a believer, only minus the weird 12-year-old's fondness for magic and the Mouse that I grew out of when I discovered alcohol.
Being a believer means that what-ifs are some of the most appealing kinds of musings; recently, it's been what if I can run so far... because if I can run 3 miles, I can run 5... if I can run 5, I can run 8... if I can run 8, I can run 12... if I can run 12, I can run 20... and that may be the same kind of slippery logical slope that results in teen pregnancy, but at least with running I'll be losing weight.
I wonder if I can run 50 miles... without chafing... I believe in Bodyglide...
Craig Park Wasn't at the Reunion, But It's Still a Friend
5.69 mi. 44 min.:34 sec. 7:49 pace.
Anyway, in a recent interview with GQ Ryan Gosling (he was in The Notebook, although he's been in better movies like Half Nelson, Lars and the Real Girl, and Blue Valentine) notes that he and his mother have always been believers, that is, that they've always had a sense of the transcendent. He then proceeds to take the reporter to not just one, but two magic shows in Los Angeles, and also mentions that one of his favorite places in Southern California is Disneyland. I guess I, too, have always been a believer, only minus the weird 12-year-old's fondness for magic and the Mouse that I grew out of when I discovered alcohol.
Being a believer means that what-ifs are some of the most appealing kinds of musings; recently, it's been what if I can run so far... because if I can run 3 miles, I can run 5... if I can run 5, I can run 8... if I can run 8, I can run 12... if I can run 12, I can run 20... and that may be the same kind of slippery logical slope that results in teen pregnancy, but at least with running I'll be losing weight.
I wonder if I can run 50 miles... without chafing... I believe in Bodyglide...
Craig Park Wasn't at the Reunion, But It's Still a Friend
5.69 mi. 44 min.:34 sec. 7:49 pace.
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
The Last Time I Murdered?
Easy - yesterday, on the way to work.
It began when on the way to work I passed a slower car, which then promptly sped up, passed me and then pumped the brakes. You can see where this story is going: things devolved pretty quickly, with me yelling Oedipal epithets and flipping the double-bird (not to worry, I was steering with both elbows safely on the wheel). The lowest point was when the other car shot past me on the shoulder of a freeway interchange ramp because I refused to speed up or slow down past a semi, and at that point I reached for the revolver I keep in the glovebox began shooting.
No - actually, I took the high-powered assault rifle I keep in the passage and riddled his car with bullets through my own closed passenger window, deafening myself in the process.
No - actually, I followed him off the road and into a Safeway parking lot where I angrily confronted him, struggled over a knife which I wrested from his grasp and then stabbed him repeatedly.
The point being that murder starts in the heart. And the real story is that at the point that he decided to pass on the shoulder of a ramp while driving at highway speeds, I finally came to my senses, dropped back and followed him from a safe distance until he took an exit - letting go of hatred also starts in the heart. The ability to let go of your anger, dissipate your anxieties, think clearly, all of that is a matter of grace, doing things with ease and positivity. Not being dispassionate, but not allowing those passions master you. And this being a blog about running means that I have to contrive some application, but I'm serious! running well is running gracefully. One may protest that this way of being smacks of passivity, but that ignores the overarching fact that one is running after an objective - you can be in the process of hunting something down, but it's all about the style with which you reach that goal.
There is a piece of videotape out in the world that, if ever it was found, would scuttle any chance I had to run for the U.S. Senate; it is footage of me running in high school. Like Al Bundy, I played high school football (unlike Al Bundy, I consider selling ladies' shoes a passion rather than an occupation), and in one of the two seasons during which I played, the coaches took slow-motion films of us running so we could analyze our form. It was quite a thing to see: I'm wearing white cleats, maroon short-shorts, and a grey cotton mid-riff t-shirt (for such a purportedly masculine sport, they sure made us dress like nancy boys - ah, the 80s), all shot in dramatic slow-mo like Jaime Sommers-style, and I remember being quietly astonished at how graceful my usually oafish teenaged-self looked, how easy my running style was, how fluid one could look even if it was just a matter of falling forward and catching yourself first on one foot, then the other, lather, rinse, repeat, the very picture of surrendered ease.
I need to learn to drive like I run.
Suburban Housing Track (and Trail)
5.27 mi. 41 min.:38 sec. 7:54 pace.
It began when on the way to work I passed a slower car, which then promptly sped up, passed me and then pumped the brakes. You can see where this story is going: things devolved pretty quickly, with me yelling Oedipal epithets and flipping the double-bird (not to worry, I was steering with both elbows safely on the wheel). The lowest point was when the other car shot past me on the shoulder of a freeway interchange ramp because I refused to speed up or slow down past a semi, and at that point I reached for the revolver I keep in the glovebox began shooting.
No - actually, I took the high-powered assault rifle I keep in the passage and riddled his car with bullets through my own closed passenger window, deafening myself in the process.
No - actually, I followed him off the road and into a Safeway parking lot where I angrily confronted him, struggled over a knife which I wrested from his grasp and then stabbed him repeatedly.
The point being that murder starts in the heart. And the real story is that at the point that he decided to pass on the shoulder of a ramp while driving at highway speeds, I finally came to my senses, dropped back and followed him from a safe distance until he took an exit - letting go of hatred also starts in the heart. The ability to let go of your anger, dissipate your anxieties, think clearly, all of that is a matter of grace, doing things with ease and positivity. Not being dispassionate, but not allowing those passions master you. And this being a blog about running means that I have to contrive some application, but I'm serious! running well is running gracefully. One may protest that this way of being smacks of passivity, but that ignores the overarching fact that one is running after an objective - you can be in the process of hunting something down, but it's all about the style with which you reach that goal.
There is a piece of videotape out in the world that, if ever it was found, would scuttle any chance I had to run for the U.S. Senate; it is footage of me running in high school. Like Al Bundy, I played high school football (unlike Al Bundy, I consider selling ladies' shoes a passion rather than an occupation), and in one of the two seasons during which I played, the coaches took slow-motion films of us running so we could analyze our form. It was quite a thing to see: I'm wearing white cleats, maroon short-shorts, and a grey cotton mid-riff t-shirt (for such a purportedly masculine sport, they sure made us dress like nancy boys - ah, the 80s), all shot in dramatic slow-mo like Jaime Sommers-style, and I remember being quietly astonished at how graceful my usually oafish teenaged-self looked, how easy my running style was, how fluid one could look even if it was just a matter of falling forward and catching yourself first on one foot, then the other, lather, rinse, repeat, the very picture of surrendered ease.
I need to learn to drive like I run.
Suburban Housing Track (and Trail)
5.27 mi. 41 min.:38 sec. 7:54 pace.
Saturday, January 8, 2011
It's Been a Funky Week, and Not in a Good Way
So, here're just the running stats for today:
A Quick Jog with Church Friends Around the Newport Back Bay. And UCI.
16.44 mi. 2 hr:43 min:48 sec. 9:57 pace.
Just 10 more miles to go!
A Quick Jog with Church Friends Around the Newport Back Bay. And UCI.
16.44 mi. 2 hr:43 min:48 sec. 9:57 pace.
Just 10 more miles to go!
Monday, January 3, 2011
I Do Not Run Like the Taliban
Since it was raining I ran at the gym and discovered that a great many people in our city appear to have made fitness-related New Year's resolutions, as every single stinkin' treadmill machine was occupied with people talking loudly (indoor voice, people!) about how much they'd overeaten during the holidays, God bless 'em.
So a couple of folks in the small group of runners with whom I'm running the LA Marathon started laughingly calling me "coach"; I tend to think of myself more as their cheerleader, only without the pleated skirt and ponytail (wait, does that make me like W? Gadzooks!), but since we may be running a modestly difficult trail near my house soon and therefore any aches and pains would be indirectly my fault, I've been trying to come up with a pre-run pep-talk, and it goes a little something like this:
If you were a skateboarder during the 80's you may remember using the term "poseur" as one of derision. Nowadays the kids are calling 'em "tryhards", as in "they're trying too hard", but the idea's basically the same. Usually, poseurs were kids who came from moneyed families so they had all of the skateboarder's gear, the Vision Streetwear hooded sweatshirt, the Bones Brigade t-shirt, the Air Jordan Nike high-tops, the carefully folded issue of "Transworld Skateboarding" magazine tucked into the back pocket of their Quicksilver shorts.
The problem was that even though they dressed the part, they couldn't play it - they'd dress like skaters but couldn't really skate. Their expensive equipment didn't bear the marks of hard use, and what rankled was their implicit attitude that looking like skaters made them skaters, when in fact it's vice-versa, isn't it?
I mean, that's part of the problem with the Taliban - well, besides all of the not-allowing-girls-to-be-educated, public executions, etc. It's not solely that the Taliban's interpretation of Islam is incorrect, nor is it that they're in Waziristan sporting Powell Peralta t-shirts under their robes. Rather, the problem I'd like to draw your attention to is that the Taliban are religious poseurs: they seem to think that acting holy is what makes you holy, just like skating poseurs thought that acting like skaters - the attire, the swagger, etc. - made them skaters. The Taliban, like poseurs, have it all backwards by thinking that by forcing people to abide by their laws and therefore making people act holy will make them holy, but instead, if you are in the presence of God then you will behave as though you are in the presence of God, if you have been made holy then you will act holy, not holier-than-thou.
You may have guessed where I'm going with all of this stuff (or maybe not): we're not running to become runners, but rather, we run because we are runners.
Did I just blow your mind? Thought so. But think of it! If all human beings, no matter one's shape, tall and gangly or short and squat, round or thin, etc. etc, were meant to be runners, doesn't that change the equation, or flip the script, as the kids are saying nowadays? If people were made to be runners, then maybe it isn't crazy that we could run for miles and miles. If people are born runners, then not only can we run 26.2, 50, even 100 miles, but we were meant to run that much.
What strikes me is the incredulity that people respond with when I present that idea to them, that they couldn't possibly run like that, which I think is such a shame because that means that these folks presuppose their limitations. It seems to me that they've already decided on what's impossible, rather than having the curiosity to explore what is possible.
And that's something I find terribly exciting: like the potential that exists in the thought that if I have been made holy I can do holy things, if I am a runner, what kind of unholy distances am I capable of?
I run like a Presbyterian!
New Year's Run with Resolutioners
15 min. on the Elliptical
4.03 mi. 35 min. 8:41 pace.
So a couple of folks in the small group of runners with whom I'm running the LA Marathon started laughingly calling me "coach"; I tend to think of myself more as their cheerleader, only without the pleated skirt and ponytail (wait, does that make me like W? Gadzooks!), but since we may be running a modestly difficult trail near my house soon and therefore any aches and pains would be indirectly my fault, I've been trying to come up with a pre-run pep-talk, and it goes a little something like this:
If you were a skateboarder during the 80's you may remember using the term "poseur" as one of derision. Nowadays the kids are calling 'em "tryhards", as in "they're trying too hard", but the idea's basically the same. Usually, poseurs were kids who came from moneyed families so they had all of the skateboarder's gear, the Vision Streetwear hooded sweatshirt, the Bones Brigade t-shirt, the Air Jordan Nike high-tops, the carefully folded issue of "Transworld Skateboarding" magazine tucked into the back pocket of their Quicksilver shorts.
The problem was that even though they dressed the part, they couldn't play it - they'd dress like skaters but couldn't really skate. Their expensive equipment didn't bear the marks of hard use, and what rankled was their implicit attitude that looking like skaters made them skaters, when in fact it's vice-versa, isn't it?
I mean, that's part of the problem with the Taliban - well, besides all of the not-allowing-girls-to-be-educated, public executions, etc. It's not solely that the Taliban's interpretation of Islam is incorrect, nor is it that they're in Waziristan sporting Powell Peralta t-shirts under their robes. Rather, the problem I'd like to draw your attention to is that the Taliban are religious poseurs: they seem to think that acting holy is what makes you holy, just like skating poseurs thought that acting like skaters - the attire, the swagger, etc. - made them skaters. The Taliban, like poseurs, have it all backwards by thinking that by forcing people to abide by their laws and therefore making people act holy will make them holy, but instead, if you are in the presence of God then you will behave as though you are in the presence of God, if you have been made holy then you will act holy, not holier-than-thou.
You may have guessed where I'm going with all of this stuff (or maybe not): we're not running to become runners, but rather, we run because we are runners.
Did I just blow your mind? Thought so. But think of it! If all human beings, no matter one's shape, tall and gangly or short and squat, round or thin, etc. etc, were meant to be runners, doesn't that change the equation, or flip the script, as the kids are saying nowadays? If people were made to be runners, then maybe it isn't crazy that we could run for miles and miles. If people are born runners, then not only can we run 26.2, 50, even 100 miles, but we were meant to run that much.
What strikes me is the incredulity that people respond with when I present that idea to them, that they couldn't possibly run like that, which I think is such a shame because that means that these folks presuppose their limitations. It seems to me that they've already decided on what's impossible, rather than having the curiosity to explore what is possible.
And that's something I find terribly exciting: like the potential that exists in the thought that if I have been made holy I can do holy things, if I am a runner, what kind of unholy distances am I capable of?
I run like a Presbyterian!
New Year's Run with Resolutioners
15 min. on the Elliptical
4.03 mi. 35 min. 8:41 pace.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)